non-White Skinheads and White Skinheads who hate Whites

The topics of Race & Religion are discussed in this section.
MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 14th, 2006, 3:47 pm

AcmeWhiteBread wrote:
M.Y.B. wrote:thas #%@& up. this only shows me how stupid some ppl still are even after the holocaust.
What are you talking about? National Socialism is not some satanic immoral giant nasty monster. It works at the tribe level in Africa, and is really a quite logical form of government. Hitlers killing of Jews and others was not a result of National Socialism. He tried to deporth them and us good old Americans turned them away. Us and much of the western world in fact did that. There is no stated principle in the matrix of national Socialism that states those who are not of our kind are to be killed. But they will not be accepted as kinsmen, or in other words, citizens. Its and idea, and an idea can be put in affect in either a positive or negative way. Almost any idea.
Like I said, more than any ideology they claimed (and it doesn't matter because even if they Hitler and Stalin ended up being the same)
Hitler and Stalin were just assholes with power

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 14th, 2006, 3:49 pm

lizard wrote:
Sentenza wrote:Absolutely true! Communism and Fascism/National Socialism have more in common than everybody thinks.
But there still is BIG differences that people need to keep in mind. Those two ideologies are similar only in economical parts.
Ideology? lol thier only true ideal was absolute power for themselves and whatever they say goes. That's their DICKtatorship ideology

Lenin didn't even like Stalin, he wanted Trotsky to be his successor.

punamusta
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1387
Joined: August 2nd, 2004, 5:55 pm
Country: Finland
If in the United States: Alabama
What city do you live in now?: see above
Location: Hellsinki, Finno-Ugria

Unread post by punamusta » January 14th, 2006, 5:55 pm

AcmeWhiteBread wrote: ??????? Maybe in Finland but her liberals like Hillary Clinton are 100% collectivist writing books like , " It takes A Village" to raise children etx. Liberals here ate very close to communist. They are pro-individualist when it comes to being pro-abortion and anti indivudualist when it comes to gun owner ship. They're, just like both political parties in this country a waste of time.
From my point of view, Hillary Clinton is clearly a right-winger. She might be a liberal right-winger instead of being a conservative, but she still is a right-winger. From US politics, I guess that Ralph Nader is closest to a left-winger, although even he isn't a traditional left-winger. Liberals tend to be liberal also when it comes to economy and markets, while left-wingers support the controling of the markets, so that the (global) free markets wouldn't turn against the working people (as it has happened) by trying to lower the value of the work so that the share holders would get as big profits as possible.
Now here is the sticking point. I was a skinhead, we were all about Jack London as he wrote, " I am a socialist and a white man, but above all IM a white man". NSDAP, National Socialist Democratic Workers Party. A government structure is in place that speaks for the workers. If that is not socialist, what is? Its semantics. Tom Metzger of White Aryan Resistance, www.resist.com is a full blown left winger.
Yes, by the economical structure the National Socialist system would be socialist. But in any other part it's way different than a traditional socialist system as Marx and Engels draw it. I read some articles from www.resist.com and Tom Metzger, and in an interview he admits that he was a right-winger, until he left that and took "some right ideas, some left ideas and some all our own" starting to "promote revolution against the Capitalists and the Social Marxists". For me all that don't sound very leftist... it's amix up of diffrent kinds of ideologies with a strong anti-communist touch. Especially as he keeps supporting racists acts. He's anti-war, anti-capitalist, and supports the proletarian movement, but then again he says that he believes in "limiting non-white world populations by any means possible". From my point of view he sounds like any other bonehead-skin I know. They all support some socialists values, but at the end they're all racists who believe in a superiority of their own "race". <-- don't like to use the word "race" as there is only one human race, and that's homo sapiens.
I happen to agree on animal rights and enviorment, and Hitler was a HUGE enviormentalist. So what does it all mean????
I'm glad to hear that you feel that way about the animal rights and environment, but being an enviromentist don't make anybody a left-winger. I know right-wingers that supports those same values, but on the other parts they're 100% right-wingers. I think that here in Europe the meaning of the right wing differs from the one you have. And with that, also the meaning of the left-winger is different... and mainly because of that we're having this conversation.
This is very true... But lets be clear, its the racial purity of WHATEVER country adapts the NS system. A pretty good example of a NS government that bends just a little on the race issue is Israel. Also those commonalities concerning industry, economy etc. Are huge similarities. Meaning they are not that far apart.
I wouldn say that Israel is a National Socialist nation as they support the modern free markets. On the economical parts they're more like an every other western country nowadays. I'd say their political system is more of a theocratic-democratic. But I do agree that Israel's government is racist, as they heavily oppress the arabic minorities in Israel as also UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has stated. Israel is one of the most severe human rights violating nations in the world.

punamusta
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1387
Joined: August 2nd, 2004, 5:55 pm
Country: Finland
If in the United States: Alabama
What city do you live in now?: see above
Location: Hellsinki, Finno-Ugria

Unread post by punamusta » January 14th, 2006, 6:02 pm

End Violence NOW wrote:Ideology? lol thier only true ideal was absolute power for themselves and whatever they say goes. That's their DICKtatorship ideology
Like it or not, the National Socialism is a political ideology. It covers up all the aspects of a political system. I do not support it, as it already has become clear, but I don't argue against the facts.
Lenin didn't even like Stalin, he wanted Trotsky to be his successor.
True. Just before Lenin's dead he wrote a letter to his fellow comrades saying that Stalin shouldn't never be his follower, but Stalin got a hold of that letter before others and the rest is history...

Lelin was a great man and a true communist, but Stalin was just a power-hungry dictator.

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 14th, 2006, 8:34 pm

lizard wrote:Like it or not, the National Socialism is a political ideology. It covers up all the aspects of a political system. I do not support it, as it already has become clear, but I don't argue against the facts.
I'm saying that no matter what ideology they claimed to have, their only true ideology within the workings of their mind was power.
Neither truly followed their ideology they claimed

In fact, Hitler was the only one that followed any part of his ideology, and it wasn't the National Socialism part, it was the part of killing other races (even though the actual Aryan races wasn't even white, it was the people who moved into the Hindus River Valley in India)

But their true ideology that they themselves followed was a Makavelian power ideology.

P.S. Lenin was better than the other communist heads because his ideology at "heart" was creating a safety net for the poor and that is why he even sacrificed communism (in the partial capitalist plan) for the greater good. The only thing was he didn't think hard enough - if his partial capitalism helped revive and boost the economy, why even bother with communism? He could have given full capitalism but increase taxes for businesses to increase programs to create the safety net for example: welfare.

AcmeWhiteBread
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 741
Joined: February 8th, 2004, 3:49 pm

Unread post by AcmeWhiteBread » January 15th, 2006, 1:41 am

This turned into a good thread..

User avatar
M.Y.B.
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 21
Joined: January 4th, 2006, 5:06 pm
Location: far away from home

Unread post by M.Y.B. » January 15th, 2006, 5:44 am

AcmeWhiteBread wrote:
M.Y.B. wrote:thas #%@& up. this only shows me how stupid some ppl still are even after the holocaust.
What are you talking about? National Socialism is not some satanic immoral giant nasty monster. It works at the tribe level in Africa, and is really a quite logical form of government. Hitlers killing of Jews and others was not a result of National Socialism. He tried to deporth them and us good old Americans turned them away. Us and much of the western world in fact did that. There is no stated principle in the matrix of national Socialism that states those who are not of our kind are to be killed. But they will not be accepted as kinsmen, or in other words, citizens. Its and idea, and an idea can be put in affect in either a positive or negative way. Almost any idea.

wtf?
the principle of national socialism was to eliminate or degrade ppl who weren't Aryan (tall, blond and blue-eyed). that was the "leading race" and jewish ppl as mostly dark-haired and the "killers of christ" were so-called bad ppl. man, do you actually think first before you post?

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 15th, 2006, 1:28 pm

Not defedning Nazis, but actually the "ideology" was basically gonvernment control

HITLER, not the ideology, was responsible for the Aryan supremecy thing

Sort of like "No Child Left Behind" which gives national responsiblity for competent teachers goes against the "small government" stance of Republicans, but Bush believes it was good so that is why many Republicans now support it.

P.S. Aryans were brown, brown eyed, and black/brown haired, they were from the Middle East and moved into the Hindus River Valley in India and conquered them. They were "lightER" skinned than the other Indians, but they weren't white at all. Hitler just heard "lighter" and "conquer" and assumed whites. My history teacher used to joke that he must have fallen asleep in his history class.

AcmeWhiteBread
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 741
Joined: February 8th, 2004, 3:49 pm

Unread post by AcmeWhiteBread » January 16th, 2006, 1:20 am

M.Y.B. wrote:
AcmeWhiteBread wrote:
M.Y.B. wrote:thas #%@& up. this only shows me how stupid some ppl still are even after the holocaust.
What are you talking about? National Socialism is not some satanic immoral giant nasty monster. It works at the tribe level in Africa, and is really a quite logical form of government. Hitlers killing of Jews and others was not a result of National Socialism. He tried to deporth them and us good old Americans turned them away. Us and much of the western world in fact did that. There is no stated principle in the matrix of national Socialism that states those who are not of our kind are to be killed. But they will not be accepted as kinsmen, or in other words, citizens. Its and idea, and an idea can be put in affect in either a positive or negative way. Almost any idea.

wtf?
the principle of national socialism was to eliminate or degrade ppl who weren't Aryan (tall, blond and blue-eyed). that was the "leading race" and jewish ppl as mostly dark-haired and the "killers of christ" were so-called bad ppl. man, do you actually think first before you post?
Uh have you ever read a book? Do you know how many Jews turned christian and were in the Nazi party? Have you ever seen a picture of Adolph Hitler, by your description he would be jewish. Your a total retard. National Socialism is a form of government that is used by many non whites. It effective and for the population under it, pretty fair. Your a retard. Read something stupid..

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 16th, 2006, 12:13 pm

^ Actually they finally gottraced it, Adolf had no Jewish blood. He was worried that he might be part Jewish due to his mother's lineage, but they traced it post-humously, he had no Jewish blood.

He wasn't blond or blue-eyed tho.

User avatar
shadoworder
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 171
Joined: May 22nd, 2004, 12:08 am

Unread post by shadoworder » January 17th, 2006, 9:06 pm

heretik wrote:
Christina Marie wrote:
End Violence NOW wrote:
Christina Marie wrote:Thats just wacked.
lol crazy huh?

I heard about this though, I think they said they have a different definition of what a skinhead is than most people (obviously many weren't even bald in the first place on top of not being white)

If you find anything on what their definition is I would love to hear that!!!
I could write a book on this. There's plenty of info on the net but many still seem to be ignorant.

Skinheads are a subculture just like punk rockers, skaters, metalheads, hardcore kids and so on. Skinheads are not a organization like the Klan, Aryan Nation or NLR. There is no 'membership' or charter.

In England, the original Skinheads (late 60s - early 70s) were an offshoot of the Mods who listened to Ska (early form of Reggae) and Soul music. They also enjoyed rioting at soccer matches. Sure, there were individual Skinheads who were racist (just like many other White working class Brits) - but it wasn't some mass movement thing assoicated with any type of politics.

They werent nazis,but they were definitely rightwing and fiercly patriotic and were for the most part anti hippie,anti gay,antiimmigrant and even occasionally antiblack,not to mention a lot of them turned out to support(rightwing antiimmgrant politician) Enoch Powell when he was campaigning

Nazi skins of today are quick to bring up "Paki Bashing" - an activity which many early skins took part. What they won't tell you is that Jamaican "Rude Boys" (a subculture which influenced the early Skinhead style) took part in "Paki Bashing". It had less to do with racism and more to do with just general hooliganism.

Jamaican rude boys did pakibashing??if so,what about it?teddy boys,rockers and even on occasion Mods did so also,so what does that prove??when spokespeople for the pakis complained to the government and even the UN about the way they were being singled out they mentioned skinheads,not rudeboys,not Teds,not mods,not bikers or hippies but skinheads as the main problem.even Pete Townsend the guitarist for mod faves The Who accused skins of having fascist attitudes and this was in the 60s. the phrase pakibashing was definitely coined by skinheads as well.jamaican rudeboys had zero to do with skinhead style,ive challenged people on other forums to produce a picture pre 67 that shows rudeboys with shaved heads and boots and braces,ive yet to see it.Ive also challenged people to show me examples of skins in the 60s attacking rascists or going after followers of enoch powell and im still waiting on that too,which proves that antiracism did not exist amongst 60s skins and that SHARPS claims of being traditional are B.S.regardless of their fondness for reggae and ska,the 60s skins were closer to todays nazi skins,then to SHARPS who didnt exist until the late 80s.


At this time, the National Front - a racist political organization were reaching out to White working class young people. Many of those young Whites were from the newer generation of Skinheads and the message of the National Front ("you have no jobs because of the Pakis" - the usual) resonated with some of these kids. The NF saw these angry youths as possible foot soldier/shock troops. Due to the media's tendency to sensationalize, Skins were to eventually become synonymous w/ the NF. The punk band "Skrewdriver" began to make pro-National Front comments on stage and later became THE White Power Skinhead band.
This is where the split in the Skinhead subculture took place.

this is more SHARP propaganda,the skins didnt become racist because of the NF,if that were the case why didnt the NF infiltrate the punk movement which back then had strong rightist leanings??why didnt they infiltrate the heavy metal subculture which enjoyed an explosive resurgence in 1979(NWOBHM)??or the new romantics or synth pop or... you get the picture,if the original skins had zero racist attitudes then how did that subculture out all these others get sucked into rightwing extremism??because the foundations were already there from the beginning,sure they enjoyed reggae music and they didnt wear swastikas,but they were patriotic,anticommunist,antihippie,antigay and antimmigrant,they were aprentices in search of a master,and in the 70s it all came together.

"Today, there are Skinheads of every race and political ideology. From the far left, to the far right. They're also world-wide."


White power skins are definitely the majority today,followed by trads,a small number of sharps and a tiny few who claim to be anarchist or commie(RASH)

AcmeWhiteBread
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 741
Joined: February 8th, 2004, 3:49 pm

Unread post by AcmeWhiteBread » January 17th, 2006, 10:29 pm

End Violence NOW wrote:^ Actually they finally gottraced it, Adolf had no Jewish blood. He was worried that he might be part Jewish due to his mother's lineage, but they traced it post-humously, he had no Jewish blood.

He wasn't blond or blue-eyed tho.

News Flash ! Jewish is a religeon ! Its not a race ! Its not a ethnicity !
To all the world, judaism is a religeon. And what even better is that a majority who call themselves jewish dont even practice the religeon??????????

none for you
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1040
Joined: January 17th, 2006, 11:09 pm
Location: right here at home

Unread post by none for you » January 18th, 2006, 1:25 am

when I was runnin on the streets of SF ( a longassed time ago!), there were these blacks (and i aint talkin' 'high yella'), really ebny blacks, that really wanted more than anything to kick it with the skins.

I could never understand this at all.
These werent SHARPs, but bonified trueblue BASH boys... and they put up with with some (not ALL) of this!
one of them was so successful he was a singer in a local punk band!

another one, a girl, was very confused... i think she wanted to be WHITE AND MALE!... man!! talk about living a fantasy.. two things she could NEVER be....


AND FYI... Hitler was a repressed artist.
Imagine if you will, a world where Hitler's art was appreciated and he had no pent up hostilities... it was a Jewish Gallery owner that iinspired hitler's political career. Funny how the world is all so twisted up.

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 18th, 2006, 2:50 am

AcmeWhiteBread wrote:
End Violence NOW wrote:^ Actually they finally gottraced it, Adolf had no Jewish blood. He was worried that he might be part Jewish due to his mother's lineage, but they traced it post-humously, he had no Jewish blood.

He wasn't blond or blue-eyed tho.

News Flash ! Jewish is a religeon ! Its not a race ! Its not a ethnicity !
To all the world, judaism is a religeon. And what even better is that a majority who call themselves jewish dont even practice the religeon??????????
I meant that neither by ethnicity nor by family religion was he Jewish/Hebrew if you want to get specific.

MiChuhSuh

Unread post by MiChuhSuh » January 18th, 2006, 2:51 am

But you're right in that most "Jews" do not practice Judaism.

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » January 18th, 2006, 11:01 am

shadoworder wrote:
They werent nazis,but they were definitely rightwing and fiercly patriotic and were for the most part anti hippie,anti gay,antiimmigrant and even occasionally antiblack,not to mention a lot of them turned out to support(rightwing antiimmgrant politician) Enoch Powell when he was campaigning
I never said the original skins were leftist and being right-wing doesn't necessarily equal being a racist. Those who were racist were no more so than many White working class Brits. Most were simply down for their shit and being down for your shit doesn't always equal racist either (as far as I'm concerned).
shadoworder wrote:Jamaican rude boys did pakibashing??if so,what about it?teddy boys,rockers and even on occasion Mods did so also,so what does that prove??when spokespeople for the pakis complained to the government and even the UN about the way they were being singled out they mentioned skinheads,not rudeboys,not Teds,not mods,not bikers or hippies but skinheads as the main problem.even Pete Townsend the guitarist for mod faves The Who accused skins of having fascist attitudes and this was in the 60s. the phrase pakibashing was definitely coined by skinheads as well.
If racism was the main motivation behind bashing pakis (as opposed to being visible and easy targets), then why weren’t they bashing Blacks in a similar fashion?

Let’s keep in mind the word “fascist” – especially when used by a leftist – is basically all purpose insult for people with right of center views (no matter how mild) – even more so if they’re pre-disposed to violence.
shadoworder wrote:jamaican rudeboys had zero to do with skinhead style,ive challenged people on other forums to produce a picture pre 67 that shows rudeboys with shaved heads and boots and braces,ive yet to see it.Ive also challenged people to show me examples of skins in the 60s attacking rascists or going after followers of enoch powell and im still waiting on that too,which proves that antiracism did not exist amongst 60s skins and that SHARPS claims of being traditional are B.S.regardless of their fondness for reggae and ska,the 60s skins were closer to todays nazi skins,then to SHARPS who didnt exist until the late 80s.
I never said Rudies sported shaved heads and boots. I said they INFLUENCED the Skinhead style – especially in terms of the suits they used to wear while dancing to reggae and soul music at the dance halls.

When groups have contact w/ each other and relations are somewhat amicable (in most cases), there’s going to be a “cross-pollinization” of sorts.

I never said anything about original Skins being anti-racist (in the Anitfa sense). NON-racist – yes but ANTI – NO . . . Some fail to see a difference, but there is.

As far as SHARPS go (at least nowadays), they lost credibility w/ me when they started latching on to every leftist cause in existence, so I can hardly be considered a mouthpiece for them.

shadoworder wrote:this is more SHARP propaganda,the skins didnt become racist because of the NF,if that were the case why didnt the NF infiltrate the punk movement which back then had strong rightist leanings??why didnt they infiltrate the heavy metal subculture which enjoyed an explosive resurgence in 1979(NWOBHM)??or the new romantics or synth pop or... you get the picture, if the original skins had zero racist attitudes then how did that subculture out all these others get sucked into rightwing extremism??because the foundations were already there from the beginning,sure they enjoyed reggae music and they didnt wear swastikas,but they were patriotic,anticommunist,antihippie,antigay and antimmigrant,they were aprentices in search of a master,and in the 70s it all came together.
I should have been clearer on that one. Sure, there were pre-existing racist attitudes among British working class Whites – I’m not denying that, but the NF went out of their way to recruit Skinheads. They didn’t “infiltrate” anything. Infiltration implies clandestine action at first, then coming out in the open when numbers are high enough (which is what happened w/ SHARP and the left). No, the front was pretty straight forward about their views. They were probably one of the few who had anything nice to say about Skins at the time.

Plus the NF was considered a patriotic organization (“Britain for the British”) and many Skins (racist and non-racist) are patriotic (that's a given).

Whether the punk movement AS A WHOLE at the time had strong rightist leanings is questionable. I know Wattie was down w/ the NF at one time (he’s pretty ‘dodgy’). I also know that many punks used Swastikas as shock value (pretty much the way mall-“Goths” and mall “punks” sport pentagrams and anarchy symbols respectively). The front probably (I’m almost certain) didn’t see much value in punks. It needs to be said, that “rightist” does NOT always equal racist.

As far as the NWOBHM crowd goes? Could it be the Front never reached out to them in the way they did Skinheads? Let’s not forget, that far left politics didn’t ride well w/ much of the NWOBHM crowd either. I also can’t imagine New Romantic or synth pop types with their androgynous imagery going over very well with Nazi Skins. I also can’t imagine these guys as fighters (it might ruin their clothes and makeup) – which is what the NF would have needed if they came up against violent counter demonstrators.

Am I saying that there were no NF sympathizers among the non-Skin crowds? Not at all. It’s just the NF didn’t see much use w/ those groups.

I NEVER said original Skins had ZERO racist attitudes - in fact I said the opposite. I'm not some Antifa type with an agenda.
shadoworder wrote:White power skins are definitely the majority today,followed by trads,a small number of sharps and a tiny few who claim to be anarchist or commie(RASH)

There’s no way that statement can really be proven – especially with biases at work (I have my share of them) so I won’t argue with you on that. Nazis will say they are the majority. Trads will say the same. SHARPS will also make that claim. I can say I’ve run into more non-racist (not necessarily SHARP) skins during my travels – but that could have easily been the other way around depending on where I went.

RASH? Don’t even get me started on that one. I’m still trying to figure out what Anarchy and Communism (which is almost TOTAL government in practice) have to do with one another.

I admit my views on the Skin culture is SHARP influenced since they were like the "doorway" for me. They were also a different organization in the late 80s/early 90s (I know White Power Skins will say different) than what they are today - if they still exist. I haven't met someone claiming SHARP (other than some wannabe trad kids) in years.

punamusta
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1387
Joined: August 2nd, 2004, 5:55 pm
Country: Finland
If in the United States: Alabama
What city do you live in now?: see above
Location: Hellsinki, Finno-Ugria

Unread post by punamusta » January 18th, 2006, 7:12 pm

heretik wrote:RASH? Don’t even get me started on that one. I’m still trying to figure out what Anarchy and Communism (which is almost TOTAL government in practice) have to do with one another.
I know that a lot of anarchist like to think that way (not saying you're an anarchist), but in reality communism and anarchism aren't that far away. It's misleading to talk about a comminust government, because in a communist system there should be no government at all. Communist (marxist) society is stateless and classless society with no authorities. Just as an anarchist society.

Mikhail Bakunin (a "godfather" of anarchism) and Karl Marx basically had only one difference: while Bakunin believed that a classless, stateless society couldbe established right away without any intermediate stage, Marx believed on a transition towards the classless and stateless society (=communism) involving a transitional stage of socialism.

More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism
http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=1336

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » January 19th, 2006, 11:10 am

lizard wrote:
heretik wrote:RASH? Don’t even get me started on that one. I’m still trying to figure out what Anarchy and Communism (which is almost TOTAL government in practice) have to do with one another.
I know that a lot of anarchist like to think that way (not saying you're an anarchist), but in reality communism and anarchism aren't that far away. It's misleading to talk about a comminust government, because in a communist system there should be no government at all. Communist (marxist) society is stateless and classless society with no authorities. Just as an anarchist society.

Mikhail Bakunin (a "godfather" of anarchism) and Karl Marx basically had only one difference: while Bakunin believed that a classless, stateless society couldbe established right away without any intermediate stage, Marx believed on a transition towards the classless and stateless society (=communism) involving a transitional stage of socialism.

More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism
http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=1336

I see what your saying here, but I was talking about Communism in practice. It sounds like a good idea on paper and in a "perfect world" setting but when the human factor (IOW "the big fat nasty fly in the ointment") is brought into it, then it falls short of it's lofty ideals.

User avatar
shadoworder
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 171
Joined: May 22nd, 2004, 12:08 am

Unread post by shadoworder » January 19th, 2006, 10:30 pm

I never said the original skins were leftist and being right-wing doesn't necessarily equal being a racist. Those who were racist were no more so than many White working class Brits. Most were simply down for their shit and being down for your shit doesn't always equal racist either (as far as I'm concerned).

Perhaps today rightwing doesnt mean racist,but at that time in the 60s i would definitely say it did.

If racism was the main motivation behind bashing pakis (as opposed to being visible and easy targets), then why weren’t they bashing Blacks in a similar fashion?

Because at that time their was a huge and very visible influx of pakistanians coming into Britain,and after some time they did start to attack Blacks too,in 1970 their were widespread attacks against blacks by Skin gangs in Liverpool.

I never said Rudies sported shaved heads and boots. I said they INFLUENCED the Skinhead style – especially in terms of the suits they used to wear while dancing to reggae and soul music at the dance halls.

Well what is Skinhead style??Its boots,its braces,its shaved heads LOL
Ive seen SHARPS try to claim that jamaicans sported shaved heads and boots and thats where the look comes from which is rubbish.as for skins who wore suits at night to go dancing,its debateable how many skins did that and if that had anything at all to do with rudeboys,remember skins evolved out of the Mods who wore suits and fashionable clothes to go out dancing all night too.
rudeboy style is basically a Jamaican pisstake on 40s gangster movies and 50s italian style.
not all skins in the 60s were into soul and reggae either,a lot still listened to the Who,Faces,Slade etc,etc.





I should have been clearer on that one. Sure, there were pre-existing racist attitudes among British working class Whites – I’m not denying that, but the NF went out of their way to recruit Skinheads. They didn’t “infiltrate” anything. Infiltration implies clandestine action at first, then coming out in the open when numbers are high enough (which is what happened w/ SHARP and the left). No, the front was pretty straight forward about their views. They were probably one of the few who had anything nice to say about Skins at the time.

Plus the NF was considered a patriotic organization (“Britain for the British”) and many Skins (racist and non-racist) are patriotic (that's a given).

Whether the punk movement AS A WHOLE at the time had strong rightist leanings is questionable. I know Wattie was down w/ the NF at one time (he’s pretty ‘dodgy’). I also know that many punks used Swastikas as shock value (pretty much the way mall-“Goths” and mall “punks” sport pentagrams and anarchy symbols respectively). The front probably (I’m almost certain) didn’t see much value in punks. It needs to be said, that “rightist” does NOT always equal racist.

As far as the NWOBHM crowd goes? Could it be the Front never reached out to them in the way they did Skinheads? Let’s not forget, that far left politics didn’t ride well w/ much of the NWOBHM crowd either. I also can’t imagine New Romantic or synth pop types with their androgynous imagery going over very well with Nazi Skins. I also can’t imagine these guys as fighters (it might ruin their clothes and makeup) – which is what the NF would have needed if they came up against violent counter demonstrators.

Am I saying that there were no NF sympathizers among the non-Skin crowds? Not at all. It’s just the NF didn’t see much use w/ those groups.

I NEVER said original Skins had ZERO racist attitudes - in fact I said the opposite. I'm not some Antifa type with an agenda.

your point about infiltration is correct,however i have seen SHARPS use that phrase as part of their ridiculous grand conspiracy of how the nonracist,nonviolent,freedom loving skins became snarling racists.
My point is that the original Skins were already so close to being hard right/nazi and that it didnt take much to go from point A(Trad 60s Skin) to point B(NF/WP skin)and if it was simply recruitment and nothing else,the NF wouldve done the same with the Punks,Metalheads etc,etc and they didnt.
Wattie supposedly is the head of the Scottish chapter of Blood and Hounour LOL.


There’s no way that statement can really be proven – especially with biases at work (I have my share of them) so I won’t argue with you on that. Nazis will say they are the majority. Trads will say the same. SHARPS will also make that claim. I can say I’ve run into more non-racist (not necessarily SHARP) skins during my travels – but that could have easily been the other way around depending on where I went.

True,its a matter of opinion.I base it on the enormous numbers of new bands,labels,gigs and sites popping up all over the place,and the very large numbers they enjoy in Europe(50,000 WP skins in Russia alone??)plus the fact that their are different factions claiming Skinhead who are WP,for example people into black Metal and Gabber Techno.whatever the case actually is,the number has increased dramatically in the last ten years and shows no sign of declining.

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » January 20th, 2006, 8:13 am

shadoworder wrote: Perhaps today rightwing doesnt mean racist,but at that time in the 60s i would definitely say it did.
I'll have to beg to differ w/ you - to an extent. I can be said without a doubt, Skins (or any other White working class Brit) would not warm to the idea of one of the Blacks in the neighborhood dating his sister (or any other neighborhood White girl). The prevailing attitude at the time (not just with Whites, but Blacks too) was to "stick with your own". However, if they were really that racist, then why was their music of choice Ska (pre-Rasta) Reggae? A musical style still as visibly associated w/ Blacks as was Soul? Like I've said before, it was more with the individual than the whole subculture. It should also be said that the attitudes of most Whites in the 60s could be labeled as "racist" by today's rigid PC standards (I won’t even go into the PC thing – you know what I’m getting at).
shadoworder wrote: Because at that time their was a huge and very visible influx of pakistanians coming into Britain,and after some time they did start to attack Blacks too,in 1970 their were widespread attacks against blacks by Skin gangs in Liverpool.
I hear what you're saying here, yet I wonder if the attacks were turf or soley race related. That was also one city. I'll have to look into that - not in an attempt to disprove what you’re saying but because it’s interesting.
shadoworder wrote: Well what is Skinhead style??Its boots,its braces,its shaved heads LOL
Ive seen SHARPS try to claim that jamaicans sported shaved heads and boots and thats where the look comes from which is rubbish.as for skins who wore suits at night to go dancing,its debateable how many skins did that and if that had anything at all to do with rudeboys,remember skins evolved out of the Mods who wore suits and fashionable clothes to go out dancing all night too.
rudeboy style is basically a Jamaican pisstake on 40s gangster movies and 50s italian style.
not all skins in the 60s were into soul and reggae either,a lot still listened to the Who,Faces,Slade etc,etc.
Ok - Until I look into it deeper by doing some research using non-standard/non-biased sources (in other words no SHARP, NS, or other agenda driven sources with a political agenda), I'll have to give you this one. I'm going by what Trads & Ska Skins used to tell me. I was told was that Skins sported boots and braces by day (on the terraces, on the streets) and suits by night. I was told those suits were influenced by Jamaican rude boys. Funny thing, I remember a friend mistaking a Ska/Traditional Skin for a Rudie only to end up receiving a history lesson (“educating the freschcuts”) of sorts from another Trad (who used to get on our cases about hardcore music and SxE style hooded sweatshirts).
shadoworder wrote:
your point about infiltration is correct,however i have seen SHARPS use that phrase as part of their ridiculous grand conspiracy of how the nonracist,nonviolent,freedom loving skins became snarling racists.
My point is that the original Skins were already so close to being hard right/nazi and that it didnt take much to go from point A(Trad 60s Skin) to point B(NF/WP skin)and if it was simply recruitment and nothing else,the NF wouldve done the same with the Punks,Metalheads etc,etc and they didnt.
Wattie supposedly is the head of the Scottish chapter of Blood and Hounour LOL.


I think we're somewhat on the same sheet of music on this one but differ on how the riff should be played (muted or unmuted, all chords or mostly single string). I couldn’t agree with you on the point about false claims of Skins being these peace loving nice guys. That has never been the case at any point in Skinhead history. Even those who made it point to avoid unnecessary trouble, wouldn't hesitate to "put in the boot" if the situation called for it. I mean, these guys were the ones raising hell at Soccer matches! In fact, there are plenty of Football thugs who earned their terrace stripes as Skinheads.

The main attraction for Skins during the late 70s (this is more opinion than fact) to the NF was the patriotism and nationalism (not to be confused w/ the Jingoism taking place in the US today) of which racism can definitely play a role.

Combine those attitudes w/ coming from the slums ("living on the dole") and instances of “one law for them but another on for us”, recruitment would have been "a snap" for the NF. When things aren’t going well, you’re more inclined to listen to those who have the answers or at least seem to (that’s my personal experience so it won’t apply to the whole).

Stil, I must reiterate there were many Skinheads at the time (late 70s & early 80s) didn’t have time for the NF, B&H or the far left but were still down for being British. The Business weren't alone with the sentiments expressed in "The Real Enemy".

Wattie . . . lol! What can be said about that guy? Wattie was supposedly NF too, but was also yapping about Anarchy. He even had some rasta chick (Rasta Deb) doing back up vocals on “Sexual Favors” from the “Death Before Dishonour” album. LOL!

On a side note (concerning Wattie), did he really chase Jello Biafra w/ a hammer? Someone told me that and the mental visual is just to funny to be true.
shadoworder wrote: True,its a matter of opinion.I base it on the enormous numbers of new bands,labels,gigs and sites popping up all over the place,and the very large numbers they enjoy in Europe(50,000 WP skins in Russia alone??)plus the fact that their are different factions claiming Skinhead who are WP,for example people into black Metal and Gabber Techno.whatever the case actually is,the number has increased dramatically in the last ten years and shows no sign of declining.
I hear you loud and clear on this one. I almost forgot about the NS Skins in Russia. They're almost like world unto themselves. In places like St Petersburg, the NS Skins roll in the hundreds (based on pics I've seen). Talk about “rollin’ deep”. Honestly, I think their NS Skin scene may evolve into another subculture which will be uniquely Russian. Subcultures and gangs are a fascination of mine so it is interesting (as well as disturbing to myself) to see what’s taking place in not only the former Soviet Union, but in all former Communist Block countries in Eastern Europe.

In the US and other Western European countries it’s really hard to tell whos’s deeper – especially when you have WP Skins going into Rockabilly and Non-racist Skins absorbing into HC or other styles.

Oh, the Black Metal thing – it seems every NSBM band from Poland is Skinhead related (Capricornus comes to mind). I haven’t looked too much into Gabber although I am aware of it (all I really know is Rotterdam Terrorkorps and they seem pretty apolitical – mislabeled files on Kazaa notwithstanding.

All in all, thanks for replying. I'm suprised this discussion hasn't degenerated into insults (something very common online) despite our differering views.

Ciao!

User avatar
shadoworder
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 171
Joined: May 22nd, 2004, 12:08 am

Unread post by shadoworder » January 20th, 2006, 11:17 pm

heretik wrote:
shadoworder wrote: Perhaps today rightwing doesnt mean racist,but at that time in the 60s i would definitely say it did.
I'll have to beg to differ w/ you - to an extent. I can be said without a doubt, Skins (or any other White working class Brit) would not warm to the idea of one of the Blacks in the neighborhood dating his sister (or any other neighborhood White girl). The prevailing attitude at the time (not just with Whites, but Blacks too) was to "stick with your own". However, if they were really that racist, then why was their music of choice Ska (pre-Rasta) Reggae? A musical style still as visibly associated w/ Blacks as was Soul? Like I've said before, it was more with the individual than the whole subculture. It should also be said that the attitudes of most Whites in the 60s could be labeled as "racist" by today's rigid PC standards (I won’t even go into the PC thing – you know what I’m getting at).

well that brings up the question is a racist someone who hates every single race/ethnicity that differs from his own?or some more then others?can you be racist and admire aspects of someone elses culture??I think so.
Ive seen many WP skins express admiration for the Japanese and their Culture,ive even recall seeing threads on various WP forums about Anime and what rightwing japanese oi bands were the best ones etc,etc.
since blacks provided the soundtrack,maybe they felt respect for them,although im sure,as you said,they wouldnt like their Sister dating a black.but like i said that didnt last too long.

shadoworder wrote: Because at that time their was a huge and very visible influx of pakistanians coming into Britain,and after some time they did start to attack Blacks too,in 1970 their were widespread attacks against blacks by Skin gangs in Liverpool.
I hear what you're saying here, yet I wonder if the attacks were turf or soley race related. That was also one city. I'll have to look into that - not in an attempt to disprove what you’re saying but because it’s interesting.

It just want Liverpool,i think it was others the following year
shadoworder wrote: Wattie . . . lol! What can be said about that guy? Wattie was supposedly NF too, but was also yapping about Anarchy. He even had some rasta chick (Rasta Deb) doing back up vocals on “Sexual Favors” from the “Death Before Dishonour” album. LOL!

On a side note (concerning Wattie), did he really chase Jello Biafra w/ a hammer? Someone told me that and the mental visual is just to funny to be true.

Wattie has a Swastika tattooed on his arm to this day,one of those small ones he probaly had someone do with a needle and India Ink,but hes never had it covered up
was rasta Deb Black??I didnt know that LOL
I hope the story is true and he kicked in Biafras head LOL.



I hear you loud and clear on this one. I almost forgot about the NS Skins in Russia. They're almost like world unto themselves. In places like St Petersburg, the NS Skins roll in the hundreds (based on pics I've seen). Talk about “rollin’ deep”. Honestly, I think their NS Skin scene may evolve into another subculture which will be uniquely Russian. Subcultures and gangs are a fascination of mine so it is interesting (as well as disturbing to myself) to see what’s taking place in not only the former Soviet Union, but in all former Communist Block countries in Eastern Europe.

In the US and other Western European countries it’s really hard to tell whos’s deeper – especially when you have WP Skins going into Rockabilly and Non-racist Skins absorbing into HC or other styles.

Oh, the Black Metal thing – it seems every NSBM band from Poland is Skinhead related (Capricornus comes to mind). I haven’t looked too much into Gabber although I am aware of it (all I really know is Rotterdam Terrorkorps and they seem pretty apolitical – mislabeled files on Kazaa notwithstanding.

All in all, thanks for replying. I'm suprised this discussion hasn't degenerated into insults (something very common online) despite our differering views.

Ciao!
You know your Music,most people have no idea what im talking about when i mention gabber or NWOBHM.yeah its nice to debate without sinking into insults LOL
and if you are going to check out gabber,the Industrial strength label in NYC is the best
take care

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » January 21st, 2006, 12:54 pm

shadoworder wrote: well that brings up the question is a racist someone who hates every single race/ethnicity that differs from his own?or some more then others?can you be racist and admire aspects of someone elses culture??I think so.
Ive seen many WP skins express admiration for the Japanese and their Culture,ive even recall seeing threads on various WP forums about Anime and what rightwing japanese oi bands were the best ones etc,etc.
since blacks provided the soundtrack,maybe they felt respect for them,although im sure,as you said,they wouldnt like their Sister dating a black.but like i said that didnt last too long.
The Japanese Oi! bands are some of the best. I saw a few (Sledgehammer/Tettsui, Raiya and Gruesome) when I was stationed in Japan.

shadoworder wrote: It just want Liverpool,i think it was others the following year
Ok. Something I'll look into.
shadoworder wrote: Wattie has a Swastika tattooed on his arm to this day,one of those small ones he probaly had someone do with a needle and India Ink,but hes never had it covered up
was rasta Deb Black??I didnt know that LOL
I hope the story is true and he kicked in Biafras head LOL.
Wattie . . . LOL!

I could be wrong about "Rasta" Deb being Black, but I'm almost 100% sure considering the ideas behind Rastafarianism pretty much seem to be afrocentric. If she is White, then it's news to me as I didn't know White Rastas were that common in the UK. I thought White Rastarians were mostly American rich white kids with a strong affinity for herb(based on those I've met).

As far as Jello goes, I don't even dislike the guy because of his views - it's his smug attitude which rubs me the wrong way. Also, I cut my teeth on some DKs records during my teens. Still, the though of Jello being chased by Wattie makes me smile.
shadoworder wrote: You know your Music,most people have no idea what im talking about when i mention gabber or NWOBHM.yeah its nice to debate without sinking into insults LOL
and if you are going to check out gabber,the Industrial strength label in NYC is the best
take care
Thanks. I enjoy reading about artists as much as I enjoy listenting to their work. I know we're gonna have our views especially with you being NS (I'm assuming so from the name) and myself Black, which aren't going to change anytime soon but I don't feel the need to start trippin'. I just wanted to let people know there is more than one variety of Skinhead.

Most people don't know about NWOBHM or Gabber or any other genre they haven't heard about via MTV or Hot Topic. Many young people these days don't like reading and it shows (i.e. referring to crappy nu-"metal" bands as hardcore). That's really sad considering the wealth of information available on the internet.

I have to check out the Industrial Strength label - I need to keep the music varied so I don't burn out.

Ciao!

3Harmonies
Straw Weight
Straw Weight
Posts: 86
Joined: December 3rd, 2005, 7:09 am

It's funny how you guys try to make sense of anything.

Unread post by 3Harmonies » January 21st, 2006, 2:15 pm

Know this is true in all cases. It's not that hard to figure out. A society dominated by a single race will have condescending regards to the minority groups. Whether it be on a subliminal, sub-conscionable, or direct level, it's always there in 1 form or another. It's like that in most nations/societies around the world and it's a natural behavior with only few exceptions. Dont try to put a band-aid over it because it doesnt work :lol:

User avatar
shadoworder
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 171
Joined: May 22nd, 2004, 12:08 am

Unread post by shadoworder » January 22nd, 2006, 12:24 am

The Japanese Oi! bands are some of the best. I saw a few (Sledgehammer/Tettsui, Raiya and Gruesome) when I was stationed in Japan.

Lucky you,a friend lent me a video of some of those bands,they were pretty kick ass,you know in japan the extreme Right is allied with the Yakuza and with Motorcycle gangs,so anti racist skins are nonexistant(or so im told)which is understandable,who wants to fight skinheads backed by the mob LOL


I could be wrong about "Rasta" Deb being Black, but I'm almost 100% sure considering the ideas behind Rastafarianism pretty much seem to be afrocentric. If she is White, then it's news to me as I didn't know White Rastas were that common in the UK. I thought White Rastarians were mostly American rich white kids with a strong affinity for herb(based on those I've met).

As far as Jello goes, I don't even dislike the guy because of his views - it's his smug attitude which rubs me the wrong way. Also, I cut my teeth on some DKs records during my teens. Still, the though of Jello being chased by Wattie makes me smile.

I assume their were whites back then who were into that in the UK
but maybe she was black,who knows.I know what you mean about him being smug,they had some good music,but I really couldnt stand the dude.


Thanks. I enjoy reading about artists as much as I enjoy listenting to their work. I know we're gonna have our views especially with you being NS (I'm assuming so from the name) and myself Black, which aren't going to change anytime soon but I don't feel the need to start trippin'. I just wanted to let people know there is more than one variety of Skinhead.

Most people don't know about NWOBHM or Gabber or any other genre they haven't heard about via MTV or Hot Topic. Many young people these days don't like reading and it shows (i.e. referring to crappy nu-"metal" bands as hardcore). That's really sad considering the wealth of information available on the internet.

I have to check out the Industrial Strength label - I need to keep the music varied so I don't burn out.

Ciao!

Im not NS,im not even a Skinhead LOL but obviously Ive listened to a lot of OI/R.A.C. in my day.did you(or do you) ever listen to bands like Skrewdriver??
did you say you were from Washington??did you know that crazy black skin chick called Lefty??
Hardcore has changed so damn much from the early 80s..most hardcore bands today sound like Metal with members who dress and act like gangsta rappers..I dont really get that LOL

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » January 24th, 2006, 4:08 pm

shadoworder wrote: Lucky you,a friend lent me a video of some of those bands,they were pretty kick ass,you know in japan the extreme Right is allied with the Yakuza and with Motorcycle gangs,so anti racist skins are nonexistant(or so im told)which is understandable,who wants to fight skinheads backed by the mob LOL
I do feel very fortunate to have seen those bands. I still look back on those times.

The Right-wing skins there are strange - well at least to western mindsets. Bands like Sledgehammer aren't tied with the bigger right-wing groups (Uyoku) due to their less than favorable view of the Yakuza.

Actually there are plenty of non-Racist skins there but their music and style follows either the "trad" thing. There are also plenty of posers over there too.

Also . . . it's not unusual to Japanese hardcore kids (NYHC types) and hip-hoppers (Japanese hip-hop has some very nationalistic elements) at the "Ice Pick" gigs (a yearly tour of Nationalist/Patriotic Japanese). It's also not unusual for bands with totally different views to play the same gigs (ex. Sledgehammer w/ their straight-laced, but bellicose Japanese traditionalism and Tetsu-Arrei who aren't so straight laced and are Yakuza connected).

I really do miss Japan. I don't think I've ever met a more "stand-up" group of people (as far as my dealings go).
I assume their were whites back then who were into that in the UK
but maybe she was black,who knows.I know what you mean about him being smug,they had some good music,but I really couldnt stand the dude.
Im not NS,im not even a Skinhead LOL but obviously Ive listened to a lot of OI/R.A.C. in my day.did you(or do you) ever listen to bands like Skrewdriver??
did you say you were from Washington??did you know that crazy black skin chick called Lefty??
Hardcore has changed so damn much from the early 80s..most hardcore bands today sound like Metal with members who dress and act like gangsta rappers..I dont really get that LOL
LOL! LEFTY!!!!! Lefty the Legend! We all used to hang out the canals slightly below Georgetown. She'd tell us stories of the old days. She'd also get on our cases for sporting shorts and baseball caps! LOL! I really miss that.

As far as RAC goes, I'm very familiar with it. I still do listen to the occasional Skrewdriver or Brutal Attack song. I can usually seperate the music from what is being said - most folks can't do that.

The whole hardcore kids dressing like rappers . . . I don't know it just happened gradually. I and a bunch of others was caught up in it too (much to Lefty's dismay). I know I got tired of sporting the same stuff all of the time. It seems like an urban thing (?) . . . If you ever watch "Felony Fights" you'll see WP skins dressing and speaking in ways most associate w/ Mexicans or Blacks. These days, I sport mostly Dickies clothing because it's cheap and often comes in ONE color.

There is a clique in Florida called the ColorBlindCutthroats. Supposedly they claim SHARP but lack the "fashionably left wing" baggage which turned me off to that group. Word has it, they firebomed the van of some Crust band. DNME is one of their bands. Actually pretty good IMO.

HC? When I started hanging out, there were people complaining about "generic" hardcore (the fast stuff). I guess the Youth Crew kids and the "later-to-be-thugcore" skins actually got good enough to learn songs off their old Testament, Slayer and Metallica albums. Come to think of it . . . the "Chugga Chugga" element took over because those parts of the song got kids dancing the hardest.

Sorry for being long winded . . .

Gotta go

User avatar
shadoworder
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 171
Joined: May 22nd, 2004, 12:08 am

Unread post by shadoworder » January 25th, 2006, 9:41 am

[
LOL! LEFTY!!!!! Lefty the Legend! We all used to hang out the canals slightly below Georgetown. She'd tell us stories of the old days. She'd also get on our cases for sporting shorts and baseball caps! LOL! I really miss that.

So did she actually had swastikas tatted on her arms?? and she really led an army of nazi skins around who wreaked havoc everywhere??LOL

There is a clique in Florida called the ColorBlindCutthroats. Supposedly they claim SHARP but lack the "fashionably left wing" baggage which turned me off to that group. Word has it, they firebomed the van of some Crust band. DNME is one of their bands. Actually pretty good IMO.

I know who you mean ,but they are hardly skins,they claim skinhead but are more like gangsta wannabe wigga types only 2 or 3 of em wear traditional skin gear,the rest wear wifebeaters and big pants hanging halfway off their asses.one of the main dudes in the crew is actually trying to start a skinhead hip hop band LOL

heretik
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 14th, 2005, 2:32 am
Contact:

Unread post by heretik » February 4th, 2006, 10:06 am

shadoworder wrote:[
So did she actually had swastikas tatted on her arms?? and she really led an army of nazi skins around who wreaked havoc everywhere??LOL
She really didn't have swazis as at all (none that I could see - her complexion was pretty dark and any time in the sun would make the tats hard to see). She did wreak havoc but that was long before I was hanging out (lucky for me, as I could have been one of the victims! lol!)

Seriously, she's one of the coolest people on earth and has a big heart. I used to disagree w/ her strongly on alot of stuff, but over the years I've realized just how spot-on she was on many things. She wasn't some self-hating wannabe -- she could kick it with REAL 'yo-boys' and could go anywhere in DC's nastiest neighborhoods (she also had ties to the NOI). She got respect from a lot of people.
I know who you mean ,but they are hardly skins,they claim skinhead but are more like gangsta wannabe wigga types only 2 or 3 of em wear traditional skin gear,the rest wear wifebeaters and big pants hanging halfway off their asses.one of the main dudes in the crew is actually trying to start a skinhead hip hop band LOL
Ouch! Hahaha . . .

I would call them Skins before I'd say the same about some milquetoast Internet "Fashion Plate" Skin who does excellent "Jesse Owens" imitations at the first sign on trouble. To each their own . . .in the long run muc of it won't matter anyway.

My theory (and that's all it is) is the hip-hop influence on the East Coast may be a parallel to what has been happening on the West coast since the early 80s. Just replace the Urban Black/Hip-hop look and style w/ the Chicano version of it. Suicidal Tendencies were just the tip of the iceberg when it came to that look. Some skaters took the look (or elements of it) and ran with it. Even the infamous Nazi lowriders used to model themselves after Mexican gangs (right down to the rags, Dickies and Locs!). Of course, there were many Mexican in LA's early punk and hardcore scenes and the NLR thing probably has more to do with prison politics.

Fashion comes and goes .. . I wouldn't be surprised if HC kids started dressing like Hezobollah . .

As far as the Color Blind guys go, if they can go anywhere with the skinhead rap thing, good on 'em. Why not? From 1999-2001 there was Neo-Hate - White Power Rap which actually sounded like real rap . . . I'm not joking . . . their page used to have WP links and Micetrap had one of their MP3s on his site. The world gets stranger by the day . . .

Post Reply