South to North Slavic theory

These concepts are socially constructed and have been given much weight. What are your thoughts?
Post Reply
VsichkoEBosh
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 160
Joined: January 9th, 2010, 4:29 pm
Country: Macedonia, FYR
If in the United States: Wisconsin
What city do you live in now?: Moon base Alphaaa

South to North Slavic theory

Unread post by VsichkoEBosh » May 30th, 2010, 9:12 pm

Rosetta stone – the monument of ancient Macedonian
– pre-slavic script and language

Abstract

This paper presents the results of research realized within the project "Deciphering the Middle Text of the Rosetta Stone", supported by Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 2003 – 2005.

In the paper, it is assumed that a syllabic script of the type consonant-vowel was used for the middle text of the Rosetta Stone. Symbols for 27 consonants were identified. By using the procedure of mirroring and rotation in the writing surface (plain), a monosemic (unambiguous) way was determined for connecting the symbol of consonant with 4 or 8 vowels. Although rarely used, the symbols for writing isolated vowels and some consonants were identified. In the analyzed text, the syllabic signs were not only written next to each other, but also they were often written one above the other in the form of what are known as ligatures. A small number of pictographic symbols were also identified.

In the process of the wiring for sound, we started from the fact that sounds for consonants and vowels in a particular language change very slowly in time, eventually within the time period measured by several thousands of years. Consequently, having in mind that the rulers of the ancient Egypt in that period was from Ptolemaic dynasty, and that their homeland was ancient Macedonia, we assumed that sounds of consonants and vowels should be preserved in the archaisms of contemporary Macedonian language. By applying this assumption in the text, which was written from right to left, without space between the words and without separation of sentences in an infinite series, more than 300 different words were identified, as well as respectable number of expressions, which have kept their meaning in some dialects of the contemporary Macedonian language. A certain number of grammatical rules were also identified which are discerned in the contemporary Macedonian language, such as the formation of superlative of the adjectives with the prefix нај_ [nai] (equivalent to the English the …… _est/ the most ……); the plural of nouns by adding и (equivalent to the English _s); the occurrence of definite and indefinite form of nouns, the frequent use of the preposition на [na] (equivalent to the English prepositions on, at,), as well as passive and active form of verbs. With these identified syllables and their wiring for sound and the definite rules for writing, a monosemic (unambiguous) methodology was generated in order to make out certain words and to read what was written.

At this moment, using our methodology for identification of the syllabic signs and their wiring from sound we are able to read a complete middle text on the Rosetta Stone, with identified boundaries of the particular words, and complete sentences, sign by sign (syllable after syllable). In this paper, besides the examples of important expressions, and grammatical rules, we present the last 11 rows of the text, starting from row 22 up to the last row. We decided to present these particular rows because this part of the text is very characteristic due to the fact that every sentence starts with the phrase (the pharaoh) ordered/decreed, which simplifies the process of comparison between our reading and publicly very well known readings of the ancient Greek text on the stone. Comparison of our results of reading the middle text and known readings of ancient Greek text, published by the British Museum, are also presented in the paper. One can very easily concludes that the two texts, so called demotic and the ancient Greek text are identical only by the contents of the pharaoh’s orders. Within each particular order, the sentences in two compared texts have different structures, which is very logical and it must be expected in each case when we are comparing two identical texts written in two different languages even today. Going further, by carefully analyzing the proposed reading of the middle and ancient Greek text, everyone can conclude that the culture level of communication with particular different ethnical group with different religion was very high. Namely, communication in such case is according to social status and the religion of particular group in those days ancient Egypt. The presented results of deciphering the middle text of the Rosetta Stone points also to the fact that there are many details which cannot be found in the text inscribed in uncial (ancient Greek) alphabet. This conclusion proves the science awareness from the time of Thomas Young (1822) that the middle text was the original. On the basis of our research we can make this knowledge more precise with the conclusion that the pharaoh’s decree from the middle text of the Rosetta Stone in original is inscribed in the language of the ancient Macedonians with letters of the alive (living) masters of that time, i.e. with the official letters and language of the state that had been ruled by them at year 196 BC for more than a century. The language that we are discovering on the middle text is definitely with the characteristics of the Slavic language, and we found every single word that we were able to identify in the text so far in all contemporary Slavic languages as well, in archaic or official version of particular Slavic language. Consequently, we can define this language as Pre-Slavic language.

http://www.organizmica.org/archive/505/rstm.shtml

So, basically, this summarizes that Russians are actually a branch of descendants of Ancient Macedonians and that the Slavic peoples originated in Macedonia - alongside Orthodox Christianity. Some Russian academics approve of this theory more than of the other one.

Azure9920
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2284
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 5:47 pm
What city do you live in now?: --

Re: South to North Slavic theory

Unread post by Azure9920 » July 26th, 2010, 5:01 pm

How is that possible when all Slavs don't even share a common genetic pattern? There are a few distinct groups of Slavs.

VsichkoEBosh
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 160
Joined: January 9th, 2010, 4:29 pm
Country: Macedonia, FYR
If in the United States: Wisconsin
What city do you live in now?: Moon base Alphaaa

Re: South to North Slavic theory

Unread post by VsichkoEBosh » December 20th, 2010, 3:02 am

Azure9920 wrote:How is that possible when all Slavs don't even share a common genetic pattern? There are a few distinct groups of Slavs.
How do you expect to migrate thousands of kilometers over hundreds of years and still have your 'original' genetic pattern?

Silencioso
Light Heavy Weight
Light Heavy Weight
Posts: 1865
Joined: August 8th, 2003, 2:27 pm
What city do you live in now?: West Los

Re: South to North Slavic theory

Unread post by Silencioso » December 20th, 2010, 3:23 pm

Don't all the indo-european peoples of Europe have a south to north origin? I've always heard the IE people come from Southern Russia or the Caucasus.

Azure9920
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2284
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 5:47 pm
What city do you live in now?: --

Re: South to North Slavic theory

Unread post by Azure9920 » December 24th, 2010, 2:36 pm

Silencioso wrote:Don't all the indo-european peoples of Europe have a south to north origin? I've always heard the IE people come from Southern Russia or the Caucasus.
Indo-Europeans settled in Europe via the Middle East.

Post Reply

Return to “Race and Ethnicity, Racial Relations & Racism”