I did answer the question. Cameroon and Mali and all these other states have low crime rates despite being poor and black for the same reason west virginia has. People dont commit crimes.Azure9920 wrote:
You didn't answer the question. No need for diversion tactics.
Then you didnt comprehend it or you didnt read their conclusion:Azure9920 wrote: What I stated is a scientific fact, deduced from the very same work your beloved genome project is working on.
Human Genome Project Announces That "Race" Does Not Exist
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/human-ge ... -not-exist
That is exactly what is not the case but is one of the most basic pillars for the creation of legends in the "non pc" crowd.Azure9920 wrote: Yes, there are physical and behavioral criteria that represent differences between racial groupings and sub-groupings,
Yes there are pmany physical traits that are different from each other, that is evident. Behavioral criteria in ethnic groups are not determined by genes. Another "Non-PC" myth.
The Nigger is Dumb, the Jew is greedy, Asians like to smile, the white man is brave and so on. Continue the list for yourself.
Im tired of saying the same things over and over again, because this topic gets old, but so be it.Azure9920 wrote: Again, you didn't answer my question.
What evidence do you have that suggests that there are no differences between people from say, Nigeria, and Mongolia?
There are differences resulting from the adaption to the environment. However genetically these differences are so small that figuratively speaking there is not more difference between the two, then between a tall swedish guy with a big nose and green eyes and a small swedish guy with a small nose and blue eyes.
"Race is a social concept, not a scientific one," said Dr. J. Craig Venter, head of the Celera Genomics Corporation in Rockville, Md. "We all evolved in the last 100,000 years from the same small number of tribes that migrated out of Africa and colonized the world."
Dr. Venter and scientists at the National Institutes of Health recently announced that they had put together a draft of the entire sequence of the human genome, and the researchers had unanimously declared, there is only one race -- the human race. Dr. Venter and other researchers say that those traits most commonly used to distinguish one race from another, like skin and eye color, or the width of the nose, are traits controlled by a relatively few number of genes, and thus have been able to change rapidly in response to extreme environmental pressures during the short course of Homo Sapiens history.
Equatorial populations evolved dark skin, to protect against ultraviolet radiation, while people in northern latitudes evolved pale skin, in order to produce vitamin D from pale sunlight.
About .01 percent of our genes are reflected in our external appearances and because this tiny percent together with the high percentage of ignorance many humans were relegated to enslavement and genocide.
http://www.trinicenter.com/sciencenews/ ... netics.htmThere is no scientific evidence to support substantial differences between groups using the popular European yardstick for evaluating intelligence. However if different groups of people, especially those that are considered the underclass, had access to a certain type of information about themselves then I can assure the scientists that even by their evaluative processes, these people will be seen as far more intelligent. However, ignorance is an equal opportunity affliction.
Since the African emigrations began, a mere 7,000 generations have passed. In addition, because the founding population of immigrants was small, it could only take so much genetic variation with it. Because of that combination, (a limited founder population and a short time since dispersal) humans are strikingly homogeneous, differing from one another only once in a thousand subunits of the genome.
"We are a small population grown large in the blink of an eye," Dr. Lander said. "We are a little village that's grown all over the world, and we retain the genetic variation seen in that little village."
Yes. There is slight variation in outside looks due to the adaption to the environment. Thats about it. A difference in intelligence and behaviour is not conclusively to be attributed to a certain group since there are way more factors influencing intelligence and behaviour than genes.Azure9920 wrote: Yes, and that mere 15% is accountable for a wide variety of differences, physical or otherwise. You cannot sincerely sit here and argue the point that there are no identifiable variations between a Japanese person and an Italian, it's ludicrous.
Race and intelligence: A sorry tale of shoddy science
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/ ... iq-science
The idea that intellect had something to do with cranial capacity was – and to some people, still is – an attractive one, and generations of researchers tried to find new ways to measure brain size and shape, and match it with apparent intellectual performance. These experiments tended to prove that white people were cleverer than black people because they were bigger-brained.
In The Mismeasure of Man, Gould revealed that they could only prove this by massaging the results, cooking the data, and eliminating the unwelcome findings. One researcher found that German brains, on average, weighed 100 grams more than French brains. He was, of course, German. Measurements also produced inconsistencies: some Caucasian geniuses had very big brains, other intellectual giants had a quite modest cranial capacity.
Some 19th century biologists argued that black people were the product of a separate creation, others that black people were inferior varieties of the same human species. A physician from Louisiana even argued in scientific papers that the people of Africa were "unable to take care of themselves" because of a disease of inadequate breathing "conjoined with a deficiency of cerebral matter in the cranium".
So the anthropologists, anatomists and pioneer psychologists started looking for other things. They tried to grade the intellectual status of men, apes and women; of Nordic, Slavic and Mediterranean races; of long-headed and broad-headed peoples; they graded them according to the average distance between penis and navel, on the closeness of their eyes, on the lowness of their foreheads.
Then they began looking for ways to quantify the intellectual performance of different national and ethnic groups: and came up with bizarre results, which ought to have eliminated discrimination purely on the grounds of colour or race but somehow did not. In the early 20th century HH Goddard tried out his intelligence tests on new migrants and found, says Gould, that "83% of the Jews, 80% of the Hungarians, 79% of the Italians and 87% of the Russians were feeble-minded."
And so the whole, sorry, miserable story continues. These transparently silly and shameful "findings" were used to justify racial segregation in the American south, and to limit black youngsters' access to higher education. These limits, constraints and segregation laws continued well into the second half of the 20th century – well into Gould's lifetime, and mine.
Well then provide a source that supports your claim that you are right and geneticists are wrong.Azure9920 wrote:
Absolutely incorrect, as I pointed out previously, the difference between a fully domesticated Chihuahua and a Grey wolf is roughly equal to the genetic distance between any European and the Bantu.
Which are still too small and mixed to be able to speak of races. Thats the whole point.Azure9920 wrote: Firstly, the criteria used to classify humans based on race is not solely limited to physical features like skin color, but rather a wide variety of traits and gene expressions that differ slightly from group to group. The fact that Sub-Saharan Africans and Europeans are more closely related than Melanisians does not deny the fact that there are genetic differences between those populations.
Yea, because the genetic variations within a population are sometimes bigger then those between two populations meaning that theoretically a fellow belgian could genetically be closer related to someone from africa then to his neighbour.Azure9920 wrote: Ethnic Belgians with no Sub-Saharan roots? I'd like to see that.
Im gonna dig out where i read it again in a few days.
Russia has had a functioning state and a national identity long before the country had to rebuild itself.Azure9920 wrote: I don't directly blame race for the troubles found in Africa or even African Americans; I blame dysfunctional people for those crimes. Unfortunately, a host of cultural variables have caused people of African descent to be plagued with problems such as low intelligence, mental disorder, high levels of testosterone, etc.
Obviously since the Eastern European nations have rebuilt themselves, the crime rates have substantially dropped. Russia's relatively recent upsurge in criminal activity stems from this transition as well and has been fostered due to a severely corrupted state. Russia is another country that I don't trust the crime stats from, I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually much higher than reported.
A functioning government is the most efective tool to prevent crime. In Europes medieval societies where it was difficult to enforce laws crime and murder was through the roof, also because of poverty.
Crime and punishment in the Middle Ages
When the states formed themselves and implemented effective law enforcement and a national identity crime went down.
In africa 99% of the countries are torn between dozens of identities wether it is religious or ethnic making it impossible to establish a homogenous society that acts in concert.
It is not surprising, that those african countries which have less of these problems are doing bettern then others.
South Africa has an enormous crime rate, but also considerable economic growth since Apartheid was ended.
Reason for the high crime rate is a high level of unemployment, that has also been caused by many blacks being held away from education systematically and now not being qualified enough for todays job market.
They werent born that way, they were made that way only for people to say afterwards: See, i knew they werent smart enough.
That is how the racist mind works. Kick an old man down the stairs and then ask him why he is running so fast.
Yet there is a growing midle class in South Africa. So there is hiope in the future. Also:
Gross Domestic Product (in million Rand):
Doesnt look like a failure to me, but more like substantial economic growth. Now fasten your seatbelts: Under Black governing.
I was talking about the white people involved. The drug cartels, the militias and lets expand it to genocides committed on people. Really. The worst genocides have been committed by white people. The Holocaust, the Holodomor, Slavery, the extinction of native american tribes, the gulags in Russia, two world wars and the list goes on and on. I have an encyclopedia about serial killers. Half of that 500+ page book are white american males. How does that work out? Whats in their genes? Its all throughout history. Cant be a coincidence right. Just like with Africans and crime. No double standards please.Azure9920 wrote:
Well, if you take a glance at the countries with the highest murder rates(Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil), they also coincidentally happen to be the South American nations with the highest Black populations. Compare Brazil's murder rate of 25 or Jamaica's rate of 59 to predominately White nations like Uruguay, Peru or Argentina with their murder rates hovering at a modest 5 per 100,000 persons.
Personally i dont think that race or genes are involved in any of this.
Jews werent considered white or european. They were the lowest scum on earth to the Nazis. You see how crazy racism can be.Azure9920 wrote: The Holocaust wasn't motivated by racism in the sense that it targeted White people almost exclusively,
Really, personally i have no use for it. Why judging a book by its cover? What is it supposed to be good for?
Even if there were races, whats the purpose of valuing humans in different categories (cause thats everything that racism is about at the and of the day)?
The only reasons for it are: To justify oppression, exploitation and discrimination.
Really thats what its all about. That is what the "Non-PC" crowd is about. Thats all folks.
Everything that is not like the 50s, when Niggers knew their place and spics were working on the field is "PC".
Because the "politcally incorrect" truth is....Exactly what? Everybody go figure for yourself.