What is the most racist country in the world??

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 27th, 2007, 3:04 pm

dont_fear wrote:I will tell you guys what, mess all the white europeans being pushed away from their land and mess all of those who feel pity on them, and i will teel you why.
I am 100% sure that the vile white ancestors didnt felt any type of remorse when they were exterminating and enslaving the native americans and blacks worldwide.
These so called white minorities raped and murdered "n" numbers of people mainly black and native americas just for the simple fact of their evil nature. I am sure all of you know about the sick and dirty history of white people. Killing people for their land and natural resources, no questions asked.
So now that the tables are turning around they get scared because they know what they have done in the past.
So no, i dont feel any remorse for white people losing the grip in Europe and in the land of the free and the home of the slave.

How do you feel about africans taking other africans land and driving them out, like the Bantus did to the Khoisan?

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 27th, 2007, 5:33 pm

johnnnny wrote:
i wasnt talking about berlin , but amsterdam where this eurabia theory is strongest

November 26, 2006 -- A RASH of pop prophets tell us that Muslims in Europe are reproducing so fast and European societies are so weak and listless that, before you know it, the continent will become "Eurabia," with all those topless gals on the Riviera wearing veils.

Well, maybe not.

The notion that continental Europeans, who are world-champion haters, will let the impoverished Muslim immigrants they confine to ghettos take over their societies and extend the caliphate from the Amalfi Coast to Amsterdam has it exactly wrong.

The endangered species isn't the "peace loving" European lolling in his or her welfare state, but the continent's Muslims immigrants - and their multi-generation descendents - who were foolish enough to imagine that Europeans would share their toys.

In fact, Muslims are hardly welcome to pick up the trash on Europe's playgrounds.

Don't let Europe's current round of playing pacifist dress-up fool you: This is the continent that perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing, the happy-go-lucky slice of humanity that brought us such recent hits as the Holocaust and Srebrenica.

THE historical patterns are clear: When Europeans feel sufficiently threatened - even when the threat's concocted nonsense - they don't just react, they over-react with stunning ferocity. One of their more-humane (and frequently employed) techniques has been ethnic cleansing.

And Europeans won't even need to re-write "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" with an Islamist theme - real Muslims zealots provide Europe's bigots with all the propaganda they need. Al Qaeda and its wannabe fans are the worst thing that could have happened to Europe's Muslims. Europe hasn't broken free of its historical addictions - we're going to see Europe's history reprised on meth.

The year 1492 wasn't just big for Columbus. It's also when Spain expelled its culturally magnificent Jewish community en masse - to be followed shortly by the Moors, Muslims who had been on the Iberian Peninsula for more than 800 years.

Jews got the boot elsewhere in Europe, too - if they weren't just killed on the spot. When Shakespeare wrote "The Merchant of Venice," it's a safe bet he'd never met a Jew. The Chosen People were long-gone from Jolly Olde England.

From the French expulsion of the Huguenots right down to the last century's massive ethnic cleansings, Europeans have never been shy about showing "foreigners and subversives" the door.

And Europe's Muslims don't even have roots, by historical standards. For the Europeans, they're just the detritus of colonial history. When Europeans feel sufficiently provoked and threatened - a few serious terrorist attacks could do it - Europe's Muslims will be lucky just to be deported.

Sound impossible? Have the Europeans become too soft for that sort of thing? Has narcotic socialism destroyed their ability to hate? Is their atheism a prelude to total surrender to faith-intoxicated Muslim jihadis?

The answer to all of the above questions is a booming "No!" The Europeans have enjoyed a comfy ride for the last 60 years - but the very fact that they don't want it to stop increases their rage and sense of being besieged by Muslim minorities they've long refused to assimilate (and which no longer want to assimilate).

WE don't need to gloss over the many Muslim acts of barbarism down the centuries to recognize that the Europeans are just better at the extermination process. From the massacre of all Muslims and Jews (and quite a few Eastern Christians) when the Crusaders reached Jerusalem in 1099 to the massacre of all the Jews in Buda (not yet attached to Pest across the Danube) when the "liberating" Habsburg armies retook the citadel at the end of the 17th century, Europeans have just been better organized for genocide.

It's the difference between the messy Turkish execution of the Armenian genocide and the industrial efficiency of the Holocaust. Hey, when you love your work, you get good at it.

Far from enjoying the prospect of taking over Europe by having babies, Europe's Muslims are living on borrowed time. When a third of French voters have demonstrated their willingness to vote for Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front - a party that makes the Ku Klux Klan seem like Human Rights Watch - all predictions of Europe going gently into that good night are surreal.

I have no difficulty imagining a scenario in which U.S. Navy ships are at anchor and U.S. Marines have gone ashore at Brest, Bremerhaven or Bari to guarantee the safe evacuation of Europe's Muslims. After all, we were the only ones to do anything about the slaughter of Muslims in the Balkans. And even though we botched it, our effort in Iraq was meant to give the Middle East's Muslims a last chance to escape their self-inflicted misery.

AND we're lucky. The United States attracts the quality. American Muslims have a higher income level than our national average. We hear about the handful of rabble-rousers, but more of our fellow Americans who happen to be Muslims are doctors, professors and entrepreneurs.

And the American dream is still alive and well, thanks: Even the newest taxi driver stumbling over his English grammar knows he can truly become an American.

But European Muslims can't become French or Dutch or Italian or German. Even if they qualify for a passport, they remain second-class citizens. On a good day. And they're supposed to take over the continent that's exported more death than any other?

All the copy-cat predictions of a Muslim takeover of Europe not only ignore history and Europe's ineradicable viciousness, but do a serious disservice by exacerbating fear and hatred. And when it comes to hatred, trust me: The Europeans don't need our help.

The jobless and hopeless kids in the suburbs may burn a couple of cars, but we'll always have Paris.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11262006/po ... htm?page=0

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 27th, 2007, 5:33 pm

^^I do not agree with all of the article though.

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 27th, 2007, 7:24 pm

i dont got beef with immigrants or decendands of immigrants in south africa, the netherlands, malaysia and france... its just that it appears to be a problem

Unread post by **frozen fire** » March 27th, 2007, 7:50 pm

Sentenza wrote:
johnnnny wrote:
i wasnt talking about berlin , but amsterdam where this eurabia theory is strongest
November 26, 2006 -- A RASH of pop prophets tell us that Muslims in Europe are reproducing so fast and European societies are so weak and listless that, before you know it, the continent will become "Eurabia," with all those topless gals on the Riviera wearing veils.

Well, maybe not.

The notion that continental Europeans, who are world-champion haters, will let the impoverished Muslim immigrants they confine to ghettos take over their societies and extend the caliphate from the Amalfi Coast to Amsterdam has it exactly wrong.

The endangered species isn't the "peace loving" European lolling in his or her welfare state, but the continent's Muslims immigrants - and their multi-generation descendents - who were foolish enough to imagine that Europeans would share their toys.

In fact, Muslims are hardly welcome to pick up the trash on Europe's playgrounds.

Don't let Europe's current round of playing pacifist dress-up fool you: This is the continent that perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing, the happy-go-lucky slice of humanity that brought us such recent hits as the Holocaust and Srebrenica.

THE historical patterns are clear: When Europeans feel sufficiently threatened - even when the threat's concocted nonsense - they don't just react, they over-react with stunning ferocity. One of their more-humane (and frequently employed) techniques has been ethnic cleansing.

And Europeans won't even need to re-write "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" with an Islamist theme - real Muslims zealots provide Europe's bigots with all the propaganda they need. Al Qaeda and its wannabe fans are the worst thing that could have happened to Europe's Muslims. Europe hasn't broken free of its historical addictions - we're going to see Europe's history reprised on meth.

The year 1492 wasn't just big for Columbus. It's also when Spain expelled its culturally magnificent Jewish community en masse - to be followed shortly by the Moors, Muslims who had been on the Iberian Peninsula for more than 800 years.

Jews got the boot elsewhere in Europe, too - if they weren't just killed on the spot. When Shakespeare wrote "The Merchant of Venice," it's a safe bet he'd never met a Jew. The Chosen People were long-gone from Jolly Olde England.

From the French expulsion of the Huguenots right down to the last century's massive ethnic cleansings, Europeans have never been shy about showing "foreigners and subversives" the door.

And Europe's Muslims don't even have roots, by historical standards. For the Europeans, they're just the detritus of colonial history. When Europeans feel sufficiently provoked and threatened - a few serious terrorist attacks could do it - Europe's Muslims will be lucky just to be deported.

Sound impossible? Have the Europeans become too soft for that sort of thing? Has narcotic socialism destroyed their ability to hate? Is their atheism a prelude to total surrender to faith-intoxicated Muslim jihadis?

The answer to all of the above questions is a booming "No!" The Europeans have enjoyed a comfy ride for the last 60 years - but the very fact that they don't want it to stop increases their rage and sense of being besieged by Muslim minorities they've long refused to assimilate (and which no longer want to assimilate).

WE don't need to gloss over the many Muslim acts of barbarism down the centuries to recognize that the Europeans are just better at the extermination process. From the massacre of all Muslims and Jews (and quite a few Eastern Christians) when the Crusaders reached Jerusalem in 1099 to the massacre of all the Jews in Buda (not yet attached to Pest across the Danube) when the "liberating" Habsburg armies retook the citadel at the end of the 17th century, Europeans have just been better organized for genocide.

It's the difference between the messy Turkish execution of the Armenian genocide and the industrial efficiency of the Holocaust. Hey, when you love your work, you get good at it.

Far from enjoying the prospect of taking over Europe by having babies, Europe's Muslims are living on borrowed time. When a third of French voters have demonstrated their willingness to vote for Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front - a party that makes the Ku Klux Klan seem like Human Rights Watch - all predictions of Europe going gently into that good night are surreal.

I have no difficulty imagining a scenario in which U.S. Navy ships are at anchor and U.S. Marines have gone ashore at Brest, Bremerhaven or Bari to guarantee the safe evacuation of Europe's Muslims. After all, we were the only ones to do anything about the slaughter of Muslims in the Balkans. And even though we botched it, our effort in Iraq was meant to give the Middle East's Muslims a last chance to escape their self-inflicted misery.

AND we're lucky. The United States attracts the quality. American Muslims have a higher income level than our national average. We hear about the handful of rabble-rousers, but more of our fellow Americans who happen to be Muslims are doctors, professors and entrepreneurs.

And the American dream is still alive and well, thanks: Even the newest taxi driver stumbling over his English grammar knows he can truly become an American.

But European Muslims can't become French or Dutch or Italian or German. Even if they qualify for a passport, they remain second-class citizens. On a good day. And they're supposed to take over the continent that's exported more death than any other?

All the copy-cat predictions of a Muslim takeover of Europe not only ignore history and Europe's ineradicable viciousness, but do a serious disservice by exacerbating fear and hatred. And when it comes to hatred, trust me: The Europeans don't need our help.

The jobless and hopeless kids in the suburbs may burn a couple of cars, but we'll always have Paris.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/11262006/po ... htm?page=0

good post

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 28th, 2007, 3:38 am

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 28th, 2007, 3:46 am

LOL..This fool is persistant with his spam.

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 9:26 am

["johnnnny"]

-usually people say that at the beginning of a conversation

Because i am not white=skin of a person is white.In Europe you say your white when your skin is white.It's about skin colour.

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 9:55 am

I asked my first question because theres usually two sides to every argument and most of it is the "christian" side. i asked it because ive never met a person in your position, there are other people besides just me who are talking about it saying different things and there is still alot of Uncertainty coming out of it....
And i wanted to know your opinion about it, like people with dual citezinships, what is your opinion about it?

Because i am not white=skin of a person is white.In Europe you say your white when your skin is white.It's about skin colour

and theres brown, black, brown, yellow, brown, red, people. Some things are obvious havent you noticed, but i thought it was muslims having the problems. Mabye i reacted wrongly when you went off topic bysaying your ethnicity when its about religon, i thought..... when you should have told me your religon. And answer my one question about people with dual citezinships, please.

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 10:14 am

johnnnny wrote:I asked my first question because theres usually two sides to every argument and most of it is the "christian" side. i asked it because ive never met a person in your position, there are other people besides just me who are talking about it saying different things and there is still alot of Uncertainty coming out of it....
And i wanted to know your opinion about it, like people with dual citezinships, what is your opinion about it?

Because i am not white=skin of a person is white.In Europe you say your white when your skin is white.It's about skin colour
and theres brown, black, brown, yellow, brown, red, people. Some things are obvious havent you noticed, but i thought it was muslims having the problems. Mabye i reacted wrongly when you went off topic bysaying your ethnicity when its about religon, i thought..... when you should have told me your religon. And answer my one question about people with dual citezinships, please.

I am Christian,protestant to be precise.And there aren't black people in Europe.If you look good,as what you precieve as black,everybody is light to dark brown.So black people don't exist in Europe.Nobody is black like in the colour black.It's about skin colour like i said.Not like you people with black=African brown=Mexican.In Europe it's simple:If you ain't white you ain't right.If your skin colour is light brown to dark brown=Nigger,simple.What about dual citizenship,personally i think it's good.Because when a Turkish guy is a terrorist or something and he's a full Dutch citizen you can't ban him from Holland,cause he's Dutch.But if he also has a Turkish passport you can ban him and ban him to Turkey.But i don't know if that's the answer to your question cause i can't find it.

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 10:19 am

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:37 pm

oh that question, what have you been reading

johnnnny wrote:alright cool i agree with you guys then the whites in south africa and the chinesse in malaysia are good things people just gotta accept it, after all they did build those nations.

Johnnny Johnnny boy i am half white:SURPRISE
-usually people say that at the beginning of a conversation, especially when someone assumes to you that your nonwhite and you dont claify it. I know there are good things brought, but you went off sounding that replacing citizens is a good thing.....

i do agree the Dutch culture is important to me.And about Berlin your right.BTW to me you sound more like a nazi,but that's probably cultural differences.
thats good to hear, but i asked how do you feel about the people with dual citizenships, that would be a problem wouldnt it?

Berlin has about 3,5 million citizens of whom 220, 000 are Muslims (160,000 Turks)..doesnt sound like a majority to me. And especially not like a majority of Arabs
i wasnt talking about berlin , but amsterdam where this eurabia theory is strongest

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 10:22 am

todays wednesday if im not mistaken but i may be wrong, just had to clear that up

What about dual citizenship,personally i think it's good.Because when a Turkish guy is a terrorist or something and he's a full Dutch citizen you can't ban him from Holland,cause he's Dutch.But if he also has a Turkish passport you can ban him and ban him to Turkey

ive noticed alot of these terror attacks are coming from people whose families immigrated to europe, is that true?

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 10:25 am

I have to clarify something about Germany,i said there were 90.000 racist crimes in 2004.I don't know how i got that number but it's wrong.
The real numbers in Germany:2004- 12.553 violent racist crimes
2006- 18.000 violent racist crimes

We always talk about right-wing but the left-wing is just as bad as the right-wing (atleast in Europe).
So left-wing crime in Germany:2005- 1240 violent crimes
2006- 1200 violent crimes

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 10:27 am

johnnnny wrote:todays wednesday if im not mistaken but i may be wrong, just had to clear that up

What about dual citizenship,personally i think it's good.Because when a Turkish guy is a terrorist or something and he's a full Dutch citizen you can't ban him from Holland,cause he's Dutch.But if he also has a Turkish passport you can ban him and ban him to Turkey
ive noticed alot of these terror attacks are coming from people whose families immigrated to europe, is that true?

The footsoldiers yes.But if you go higher up the rank,mostly Middle-Eastern to North-Afrika.

Unread post by **Sentenza** » March 28th, 2007, 10:41 am

johnnnny wrote:todays wednesday if im not mistaken but i may be wrong, just had to clear that up

What about dual citizenship,personally i think it's good.Because when a Turkish guy is a terrorist or something and he's a full Dutch citizen you can't ban him from Holland,cause he's Dutch.But if he also has a Turkish passport you can ban him and ban him to Turkey
ive noticed alot of these terror attacks are coming from people whose families immigrated to europe, is that true?

Until this day not a single Turk was involved in a terrorist attack outside of Turkey.

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 11:13 am

-germany doesnt have a problem the same as france and amsterdam i think its more of a religous thing there, and in france and neatherlands its a colour thing. Then south africa is a colour thing, and Malayia is more about governments. Amsterdam could be another singapore

Unread post by **Noog** » March 28th, 2007, 11:52 am

Maybe I've misunderstood you Odog (again, hell), but are you saying there are no black people in Europe? What do you mean, can you clarify? In UK, many British peeps are from African and Carribean heritage - of all shades from the blackest African to a fair skinned African and a black Jamaican to a fairer skinned Jamaican. Mash that up with peeps of 'dual heritage' and theres a host more peeps who are also black......same in France but there theres more peeps from African & North African rather than Carribean origins....

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 12:07 pm

Noog wrote:Maybe I've misunderstood you Odog (again, hell), but are you saying there are no black people in Europe? What do you mean, can you clarify? In UK, many British peeps are from African and Carribean heritage - of all shades from the blackest African to a fair skinned African and a black Jamaican to a fairer skinned Jamaican. Mash that up with peeps of 'dual heritage' and theres a host more peeps who are also black......same in France but there theres more peeps from African & North African rather than Carribean origins....

In Holland we don't have the therm black=African.Nobody is really black like in the colour black.Everybody is brown,some dark brown some light brown.Even those who you think are really black are just dark brown.So Africans are brown coloured people not black.Now you gonna comeback that you have really seen people who are really black,which i doubt but,because maybe 1 or 10 or maybe 20% is black you can't say they are black.They are brown like every other African,Asian,South-American race/ethnicity.And i'm talking about skin colour here.

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 1:09 pm

-i dont even know what your saying anymore im talking about eurabia, not the amount of black people in a country.....
-you talking about foot soilders, and european culture being boring and in need of a chane whether the people like it or not

-germany doesnt have a problem the same as france and amsterdam i think its more of a religous thing there, and in france and neatherlands its a colour thing. Then south africa is a colour thing, and Malayia is more about governments. Amsterdam could be another singapore

-these are problems, changes whatever you wanna think them as, they are what they are
-i asked you directly how you felt as a muslim, because i thought you were muslim, and when you told me your Christian,protestant you didnt have an answer for me about eurabia, because your not muslim or arabic. You cant tell me what its like to not wear a turben overtop your head when its your culture, Etc etc etc.....

Noog wrote:
Maybe I've misunderstood you Odog (again, hell), but are you saying there are no black people in Europe? What do you mean, can you clarify? In UK, many British peeps are from African and Carribean heritage - of all shades from the blackest African to a fair skinned African and a black Jamaican to a fairer skinned Jamaican. Mash that up with peeps of 'dual heritage' and theres a host more peeps who are also black......same in France but there theres more peeps from African & North African rather than Carribean origins....

actually i am misunderstanding you, you keep getting racial when im think its a religous problem. I know the majority of people would be brown dark brown, but thats not my concern.

In Holland we don't have the therm black=African.Nobody is really black like in the colour black.Everybody is brown,some dark brown some light brown.Even those who you think are really black are just dark brown.So Africans are brown coloured people not black.Now you gonna comeback that you have really seen people who are really black,which i doubt but,because maybe 1 or 10 or maybe 20% is black you can't say they are black.They are brown like every other African,Asian,South-American race/ethnicity.And i'm talking about skin colour here

Thats a really good piece of information, WOW, you think i never hung out with dark african from ghana, congo, angola, rwanda, chad, and jamaica??????

Odog · Unread post by **Odog** » March 28th, 2007, 1:44 pm

I wasn't commenting to you.Noog asked me something and i answered the question.

Unread post by **Lonewolf** » March 28th, 2007, 1:50 pm

What is the most racist country in the world??

"STREETGANGS.COM"

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » March 28th, 2007, 1:57 pm

Odog wrote:I wasn't commenting to you.Noog asked me something and i answered the question.

sorry i thought what noog posted you posted and what you posted you were expanding on that, which confused me

What is the most racist country in the world??

"STREETGANGS.COM"

aside from the spammers and a few bad apples i dont think it is like it used to be

dont_fear · Unread post by **dont_fear** » March 29th, 2007, 1:34 pm

The white people label everything, evil bastards, the so called blacks are not really black, they are browns, yea thats rite black people are brown.
Never mind what these racist fools say
Black=brown, some light brown and others dark brown.

Unread post by **A Ghost** » March 29th, 2007, 9:58 pm

Lonewolf wrote:What is the most racist country in the world??

"STREETGANGS.COM"

correction

"STEETGANGS.COM"

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » April 1st, 2007, 9:37 am

check out these 1994 crime statistics

1994 statistics:

Number of violent crimes committed by whites against blacks: 135,400

Number of violent crimes committed by blacks against whites: 1,140,700

Number of whites charged with anti-black hate crimes: 2,336

Number of blacks charged with anti-white hate crimes: 718

i read that alot of police officers dont write if its actually a black on white hate crime, and that they just think of it as another crime

johnnnny · Unread post by **johnnnny** » April 1st, 2007, 9:41 am

not think but pass it off as another crime

Unread post by **GottaLoveLA** » April 1st, 2007, 2:41 pm

since Vietnam hasnt been mentioned, they get my vote

Unread post by **AcmeWhiteBread** » April 1st, 2007, 10:14 pm

perongregory wrote:
AcmeWhiteBread wrote:My favorite pick would be the "Colored" vs The " Black " in the townships around South Africa. Winnie Mandela and her " Soccer Team "
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference ... ?offset=20&

Bunch of hired guns..... lol no white man has ever killed as many blacks as blacks have killed, yet again it is so easy to point the finger..
Whited have been the minority of this world since the beggining of time and yet its still all our fault..
you made yourselves the vengeful hateful minortiy you seek to classify blacks as by creating the absurd concept of scientific race itself.

Race is merly a further extension of tribalism. You take one tribe and they are afraid of or maybe envious of the other and so the deomnize them To belive the white created racism is so retarded. It again is tribalism, based on distinction of one fro mthe other taken to a simple point of difference. COLOR. And color is only your first indicator that this is not your fellow tribesman, this is an outsider. Just like when a lion sees a monkey coming down the trail, he see's an outsider.Yet there both mammals they are different. There is no evil in it.

Unread post by **A Ghost** » April 1st, 2007, 10:34 pm

johnnnny wrote:check out these 1994 crime statistics

1994 statistics:

Number of violent crimes committed by whites against blacks: 135,400

Number of violent crimes committed by blacks against whites: 1,140,700

Number of whites charged with anti-black hate crimes: 2,336

Number of blacks charged with anti-white hate crimes: 718

i read that alot of police officers dont write if its actually a black on white hate crime, and that they just think of it as another crime

where the hell did you get that from?

WTF?

Unread post by **100** » April 7th, 2007, 1:05 pm

trent wrote:i'll say america.were the only country that worries about color.other countries are based on culture.for an example:you go to cuba,you have a white man and a black man,they both speak spanish eat the same foods listen to the same music.they call each other cubans or cubano brother cause the share the same culture.here,we don't call each other americans. it's either black,white,or brown.

you my friend are a good liar

Unread post by **100** » April 7th, 2007, 1:08 pm

Sentenza wrote:
johnnnny wrote:-russia cause of the skin head riots

-nigeria thats a HUGE mabye, and i dont deal with mabyes so nigeria isnt racist mabye they are but i got no evidence of that
[/quote]

In Nigeria its a mix of ethnic and religious problems. Tribes vs. other tribes (Ibo vs. Haussa etc.) Christians against Muslims etc.

^^^ THATS NOT RACIAL YOU IDIOT THERE ALL AFRICAN AND WHAT DOES RELIGION HAVE TO DO WITH RACE?

Unread post by **100** » April 7th, 2007, 1:15 pm

johnnnny wrote:
justice league wrote: as a nation... America is so far removed from being racist I think anyone who states otherwise needs a head exam. I mean geez loweez... was the civil war about white rights? I think not.
lol even though alot of whites died to free the slaves(1% of the american population), and very few blacks acknolowdge it. You statement is false. American government is very much racist, way too many examples.

DUDE STOP IT the population then was not as large as is now not even close, and what your saying is not totally true show the name of the abolitionist who died for african slaves!