TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Discuss anything music from hip-hop to R&B to alternative music and all Sports.
Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by Mcminister » May 29th, 2008, 11:32 am

Over the next couple of weeks you'll hear lots of theories about why TV ratings are surging for the NBA playoffs.
Of course it helps that large TV markets with storied franchises (Boston and Los Angeles) are still alive and favorites to make the NBA Finals. And, yes, it helps that the league's two most successful franchises over the last five years (San Antonio and Detroit) are competing against the Lakers and the Celtics.

The conference finals are littered with big stars, too. Kobe, Kevin Garnett, Tim Duncan, Paul Pierce, Tony Parker, Ray Allen, Manu Ginobili, Rasheed Wallace and all the rest could make up an all-star team that the rest of the league couldn't beat.

Obviously, there are a lot of factors contributing to the ratings numbers that TNT, ESPN and ABC keep bragging about in nearly daily press releases.

The NBA has been experiencing a resurgence ever since the Suns traded for Shaquille O'Neal, the Lakers acquired Pau Gasol, the Mavericks got hoodwinked into snagging Jason Kidd and the Cavaliers picked up new spare parts for LeBron.

But there's one issue driving improved ratings that likely won't be touched by all the NBA talking heads on TNT and ESPN.

Tattoos. Or rather the lack of tattoos in the conference finals.

Part of the reason more people are watching these playoffs is because the average fan isn't constantly repulsed by the appearance of most of the players on the court. Most of the key players left in the playoffs don't look like recent prison parolees.

The only accurate way to describe Garnett, Pierce, Duncan, Allen, Manu, Parker and even Kobe is "clean cut." Yeah, there are a couple of tattoos in that group — Duncan has something on his back, Kobe still has his post-rape-allegation tat — but the Lakers, Spurs and Celtics have far less ink on average than your typical NBA franchise.

Allen Iverson and Carmelo Anthony have more tats on their hands than the entire Spurs roster.

I know many of you probably think the number of tattoos doesn't influence viewing habits. You're wrong. Like everything else televised, appearances matter. There's a reason you don't see nude scenes in movies with fat people. Trust me, fat people have sex. It's just no one wants to see it. Not even fat people.

No one wants to watch Delonte West or Larry Hughes play basketball (WRONG). It's uncomfortable and disconcerting. You don't want your kids to see it. You don't want your kids to think they should decorate their neck, arms, hands, chest and legs in paint. You don't want to waste time explaining to your kids that some millionaire athletes have so little genuine self-confidence that they find it necessary to cover themselves in tattoos as a way to mask their insecurities.


You just want to watch basketball and feel like you're watching people you can relate to a little bit, people you somewhat respect.


We finally have that again on the NBA's biggest stage, and everyone can see it because the league's substance isn't covered in a barrel of tattoo ink.

David Stern has been arguing that the NBA is the best book. Ever since Ron Artest went into the stands, Stern has been slowly changing the cover of his book. The dress code and the age limit have helped. The midseason trades helped. Garnett's donning of a Celtics jersey really helped. Kobe's maturity and ascension to Jordan's throne has probably been the most important development. Kobe is everything the league wants LeBron James to be.

But don't underestimate how much having a visually pleasing product to look at has benefitted the league at conference finals time.

It's a television show. Pleasant smiles, non-threatening people sell products better than menacing, tattooed brutes.

If I was David Stern, I'd commission Nike and/or Under Armor to create a basketball jersey with long sleeves, all the way down to the wrists. I'd make Iverson wear a turtleneck jersey with sleeves. I'd cover the tats.

Do you think Sports Illustrated would let its swimsuit models cover themselves in tattoos? Models are paid to look good. Athletes are no different from models. Everyone accepts that female basketball players — when possible — are pushed to showcase their feminine beauty.

It's unfortunate that too many young athletes are too unenlightened to approach the game like a business. They resist almost all ideas that would put more money in their pockets. They have to be forced to do the little things that would help them make more money.

Growing NBA ratings is what's best for the players in the long term. Adopting a non-prison-ready appearance would help everyone in the league earn more money. But no one will talk about it.

Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

Unread post by Mcminister » May 29th, 2008, 11:33 am

this foo is damn ignorant

Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

Unread post by Mcminister » May 29th, 2008, 11:35 am

i said this befor n now its happenin....now very soon;no braids or dread locs
with a foo like this sayin " we don wana see braid havin, or dread loced thugs"

$outhPhillypuppet
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2277
Joined: April 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Oregon
What city do you live in now?: over there
Location: home or something

Unread post by $outhPhillypuppet » May 29th, 2008, 11:50 am

NBA ratings are low cuz most of the teams with major markets suck.
besides LA,Boston and Detroit the other big market teams are garbage.

Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

Unread post by Mcminister » May 29th, 2008, 2:28 pm

word.word.....denver is big market but it sucks, and atlanta hawks, knicks, nets, all'em hose

$outhPhillypuppet
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2277
Joined: April 18th, 2006, 10:32 pm
Country: United States
If in the United States: Oregon
What city do you live in now?: over there
Location: home or something

Unread post by $outhPhillypuppet » May 29th, 2008, 4:22 pm

teams that need to be good AND a star player for great ratings

1
New York
Los Angeles
Boston

2
Chicago
Philadelphia

3
Dallas
Atlanta
Indiana

4
Houston <--with a healthy Yao Ming
Toronto <---only Canadian team in NBA



And instead of putting the hornets in Oklahoma city they should put them in Las Vegas.

Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

Unread post by Mcminister » June 1st, 2008, 2:27 am

yea but a team in Los vegas dats kinda strange...

i dono like the fact that jersey is movin to brooklyn..and gay ass carter is also killin the ratings...he ain got no tatoo's shiit..that nigga use to be my favourite now i cant think of nothin but swear words while thinkin buot him....


i feel sorry for iverson he still has all that skill but he is gettin limited by the thirst for a ring ...shuda been a celtic for a year and traded back...or maybe go to the spurs or somthin..coz everybody forgetin that allen iverson is one of the greatest.....he wud have been scorin proly more than kobe if he wasnt in the nuggets with anthony...

thetheory
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: January 9th, 2008, 7:17 pm
What city do you live in now?: North Philly

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by thetheory » July 20th, 2008, 2:56 pm

Having a team in Vegas is a very bad idea. There will always be somebody worried about the casino influence.

By the way, if not for Iverson when Jordan left, the NBA might be a hell of a lot worse off.

DetFJ
Straw Weight
Straw Weight
Posts: 28
Joined: March 28th, 2008, 7:39 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by DetFJ » July 23rd, 2008, 1:10 pm

the dude who wrote that probably crosses the street to avoid Black people

Mcminister
Heavy Weight
Heavy Weight
Posts: 2900
Joined: July 4th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by Mcminister » July 24th, 2008, 2:41 am

hahahahaha

i cant lie sometimes when i c them white folks tatted from head to toe i think they bikers or some white gang shit ...or even asians and hespanics....especially tear drops....i automaticaly assume they packin, have packed, done crime or still do it......but i assume...

thebasher
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 107
Joined: September 19th, 2008, 7:31 pm
What city do you live in now?: los angeles

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by thebasher » October 12th, 2008, 11:40 pm

I DOUBT IT

ricardoa
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: August 8th, 2007, 1:28 am
What city do you live in now?: East coast

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by ricardoa » October 13th, 2008, 2:26 am

yea i dont know if i beleive that..

HisHighness
Straw Weight
Straw Weight
Posts: 27
Joined: October 26th, 2007, 12:44 am

Re: TATTED PLAYERS REASON WHY NBA RATINGS ARE LOW

Unread post by HisHighness » October 15th, 2008, 12:12 am

straying too far away from what basketball is about...dont matter what they look like aslong as they can play ball..who cares? thats what parents should be teaching there kids! dont judge books by their cover

Post Reply