DID GOD CREATE THE UNIVERSE??

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 8:38 am

The genetic code is composed of four letters (Nucleotides), which are arranged into sixty-four words of three letters each (triplets or codons). These words are organized in sequence to produce sentences (Genes). Several related sentences are strung together and perform as paragraphs (Operons). Tens of thousands of paragraphs comprise chapters (Chromosomes), and a full set of chapters contain all the necessary information for a readable book

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 8:44 am

The equivalent of twenty million books is inside the heads of every one of us. The brain is a very big place in a small space

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 8:49 am

but at the basic of all that we made up of just atoms of the elements around us, the same atoms that are in inanimate objects, flesh is just a different combination of those atoms....

add some electrical (stimulating) properties and you have a living biomass, that is characterised by what genes it has

all our thoughts i think are electrical,

but what creates the soul?

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 8:53 am

To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 8:54 am

i garuntee you that the 5 most abundant elements in the earths crust are the ones that make us up, we live on a carbon planet and were a product of that

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 8:56 am

PELON wrote:To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith

i believe life was created through chaos, and life was a balance to the chaos equation

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 8:56 am

When we examine the complexity of life and the improbability of life developing from non-life, we are forced to come to the conclusion that a Super-Intelligent Designer is the source for life.

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 8:58 am

The possibility of life coming into existence on its own requires two elements time and probability.....HERE IS WHY...Specificity is the measure of the improbability of a pattern which actually occurs against a background of alternatives…Let us imagine that there is a pack of 52 cards well shuffled and lying face-downwards on a table. What are the chances of picking all the cards up in a correct suit, sequence starting with the Ace of Spades and working downwards and then through the other suits and finishing with the Two of Clubs?

Well, the chance of picking up the first card correctly is 1 in 52, the second 1 in 51, the third card 1 in 50, the fourth card 1 in 49 and so forth. So the chance of picking up the whole pack correctly is Factorial 52.

As one chance in… (About) 1068 this number is approaching that of all the atoms in the universe.

· Number of seconds back from now to the estimated date of the Big Bang is 4 x 1017 (1018)

· Number of atoms in the universe: 1080

· Number of photons in the universe: 1088

· Number of stars in the universe: 1022

· Number of wavelengths of light to traverse the universe 2 x 1033

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 9:05 am

think about it man, a planet is in chaos (archean age), then over time settles down and forms a habitable atmosphere that allows bacteria to grow and evolve (us)

Life forms from when chaos is balanced, i think, but what do u mean --^

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 9:08 am

johnnny wrote:think about it man, a planet is in chaos (archean age), then over time settles down and forms a habitable atmosphere that allows bacteria to grow and evolve (us)

Life forms from when chaos is balanced, i think, but what do u mean --^

U THINK?? GET UR FACTS STRAIGHT.........

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 9:09 am

man the earth was a molten body once (non life)
it cooled down (balance)
and became suitable for bacteria (life)

simple enough to me

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 9:10 am

Macroevolution ultimately argues that man came from rock. With no transitional fossils, and mathematically probability rendering evolution impossibility those holding such a view are operating under blind faith with little logic behind the position

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 9:12 am

how do u mean?

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 9:18 am

johnnny wrote:how do u mean?

Microevolution is distinct from macroevolution no mutation is involved. Microevolution or adaptation uses the genetic variety already in the system of the living organism. For example, within every person is a gene code with genetic potential. If a 7-foot woman man married, a 5-foot man there is a certain probability that if they had 100 children a certain percentage will be 7 foot and 5 foot. However, zero probability that they will develop wings. In order for the couples children to develop wings new genetic information needs introduction into their genetic code. Since there is no outside intelligent source for this information, mutation is the only viable method. This is the difference between microevolution and macroevolution.

Unread post by **johnnny** » January 25th, 2007, 10:06 am

so yea the single celled bacteria evolved into multi celled bacteria, and from there we have what we have today,

Unread post by **Sentenza** » January 25th, 2007, 11:30 am

PELON wrote:To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith

Not if you believe that god is life....

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 11:32 am

Sentenza wrote:
PELON wrote:To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith
Not if you believe that god is life....

HOW CAN GOD BE LIFE IF HE CREATED LIFE SUPPOSEDLY...?

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 11:59 am

Unread post by **frozen fire** » January 25th, 2007, 12:01 pm

pelon talk a lttle of science, and alot of crazy talk.

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 12:02 pm

frozen fire wrote:pelon talk a lttle of science, and alot of crazy talk.

Unread post by **frozen fire** » January 25th, 2007, 12:03 pm

http://www.hyahya.org/articles/20questions01.php

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 12:07 pm

http://www.truthnet.org/Christianity/Ap ... efromGod6/

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 12:09 pm

http://www.truthnet.org/Christianity/Ap ... utiontrue4

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 12:09 pm

Unread post by **frozen fire** » January 25th, 2007, 12:12 pm

i aint a christian and i already know about the corruption of the bible.

http://www.jamaat.net/bible/Bible1-3.html

^^IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD? By the great Ahmed Deedat. if any of you are intrested.

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 25th, 2007, 12:13 pm

frozen fire wrote:i aint a christian and i already know about the corruption of the bible.

http://www.jamaat.net/bible/Bible1-3.html

^^IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD? By the great Ahmed Deedat. if any of you are intrested.

CHECK ALL AROUND THE SITE.....

heeh2 · Unread post by **heeh2** » January 27th, 2007, 12:03 pm

To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith

the best answer is simply, that the univurse has always been here, and always will be

if god dosnt need a creator, why should the univurse?

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 28th, 2007, 4:21 am

heeh2 wrote:
To believe that life could have come from non-life would require an incredible amount of faith
the best answer is simply, that the univurse has always been here, and always will be

if god dosnt need a creator, why should the univurse?

WHY IS THERE SO MANY MEANINGS TO EVERYTHING WE TRY TO EXPLAIN..

Unread post by **BlaKK** » January 28th, 2007, 5:57 am

if god dosnt need a creator, why should the univurse?

wtf

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 28th, 2007, 8:07 am

BlaKK wrote:
if god dosnt need a creator, why should the univurse?

wtf

WTF!!!!!

Unread post by **Sentenza** » January 28th, 2007, 8:11 am

Because the Universe is a logical conception. Logical conceptions need "conceptors".

PELON · Unread post by **PELON** » January 28th, 2007, 6:37 pm

Sentenza wrote:Because the Universe is a logical conception. Logical conceptions need "conceptors".